more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 6132
[filed under theme 9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 5. Composition of an Object
]
Full Idea
Composition as identity implies that no persisting object ever changes its parts, which is clearly false, so composition as identity is false.
Clarification
'Composition as identity' (Lewis) says a thing just is its parts
Gist of Idea
Composition as identity is false, as it implies that things never change their parts
Source
Trenton Merricks (Objects and Persons [2003], §1.IV)
Book Ref
Merricks,Trenton: 'Objects and Persons' [OUP 2003], p.22
A Reaction
Presumably Lewis can say that when a thing subtly changes its parts, it really does lose its strict identity, but becomes another 'time-slice' or close 'counterpart' of the original object. This is a coherent view, but I disagree. I'm a believer.
The
28 ideas
from 'Objects and Persons'
14229
|
Merricks agrees that there are no composite objects, but offers a different semantics
[Merricks, by Liggins]
|
6123
|
Empirical investigation can't discover if holes exist, or if two things share a colour
[Merricks]
|
6124
|
I say that most of the objects of folk ontology do not exist
[Merricks]
|
6130
|
'Composition' says things are their parts; 'constitution' says a whole substance is an object
[Merricks]
|
6125
|
We can eliminate objects without a commitment to simples
[Merricks]
|
6127
|
'Unrestricted composition' says any two things can make up a third thing
[Merricks]
|
6128
|
Objects decompose (it seems) into non-overlapping parts that fill its whole region
[Merricks]
|
6133
|
If my counterpart is happy, that is irrelevant to whether I 'could' have been happy
[Merricks]
|
6131
|
Composition as identity is false, as identity is never between a single thing and many things
[Merricks]
|
6132
|
Composition as identity is false, as it implies that things never change their parts
[Merricks]
|
6134
|
Is swimming pool water an object, composed of its mass or parts?
[Merricks]
|
6135
|
A crumbling statue can't become vague, because vagueness is incoherent
[Merricks]
|
6136
|
Eliminativism about objects gives the best understanding of the Sorites paradox
[Merricks]
|
6137
|
Clay does not 'constitute' a statue, as they have different persistence conditions (flaking, squashing)
[Merricks]
|
6138
|
It seems wrong that constitution entails that two objects are wholly co-located
[Merricks]
|
6140
|
Maybe the word 'I' can only refer to persons
[Merricks]
|
6141
|
There is no visible difference between statues, and atoms arranged statuewise
[Merricks]
|
6143
|
Prolonged events don't seem to endure or exist at any particular time
[Merricks]
|
6142
|
The 'folk' way of carving up the world is not intrinsically better than quite arbitrary ways
[Merricks]
|
6144
|
You hold a child in your arms, so it is not mental substance, or mental state, or software
[Merricks]
|
6145
|
Intrinsic properties are those an object still has even if only that object exists
[Merricks]
|
6146
|
Before Creation it is assumed that God still had many many mental properties
[Merricks]
|
6147
|
The hypothesis of solipsism doesn't seem to be made incoherent by the nature of mental properties
[Merricks]
|
6148
|
Human organisms can exercise downward causation
[Merricks]
|
6149
|
Free will and determinism are incompatible, since determinism destroys human choice
[Merricks]
|
6150
|
The 'warrant' for a belief is what turns a true belief into knowledge
[Merricks]
|
14472
|
If atoms 'arranged baseballwise' break a window, that analytically entails that a baseball did it
[Merricks, by Thomasson]
|
14469
|
Overdetermination: the atoms do all the causing, so the baseball causes no breakage
[Merricks]
|