more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6267

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / G. Scientific Philosophy / 3. Scientism ]

Full Idea

The acknowledgement that the sphere of knowledge is wider than the sphere of 'science' seems to me to be a cultural necessity if we are to arrive at a sane and human view of ourselves or of science.

Gist of Idea

A culture needs to admit that knowledge is more extensive than just 'science'

Source

Hilary Putnam (Meaning and the Moral Sciences [1978], Intro)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Meaning and the Moral Sciences' [RKP 1981], p.5


A Reaction

A very nice remark, with which I intuitively agree, but then you are left with the problem of explaining how something can qualify as knowledge when it can't pass the stringent tests of science. How wide to we spread, and why?


The 30 ideas with the same theme [science is the way to solve philosophical problems]:

My Meditations are the complete foundation of my physics [Descartes]
Without philosophy, science is barren and futile [Hegel]
Science can drown in detail, so we need broad scientists (to keep out the metaphysicians) [Comte]
Only positivist philosophy can terminate modern social crises [Comte]
I am saturated with the spirit of physical science [Peirce]
Philosophy is an experimental science, resting on common experience [Peirce]
Scientific knowledge is nothing without a prior philosophical 'faith' [Nietzsche]
If philosophy controls science, then it has to determine its scope, and its value [Nietzsche]
Philosophy should be built on science, to reduce error [Russell]
Philosophers usually learn science from each other, not from science [Russell]
Philosophy is similar to science, and has no special source of wisdom [Russell]
Philosophy is not separate from or above empirical science [Neurath]
Science is all the true propositions [Wittgenstein]
Philosophy deals with the questions that scientists do not wish to handle [Ayer]
Philosophy is continuous with science, and has no external vantage point [Quine]
A culture needs to admit that knowledge is more extensive than just 'science' [Putnam]
'True' and 'refers' cannot be made scientically precise, but are fundamental to science [Putnam]
Modern philosophy tends to be a theory-constructing extension of science, but there is also problem-solving [Nagel]
All worthwhile philosophy is synthetic theorizing, evaluated by experience [Papineau]
If infatuation with science leads to bad scientism, its rejection leads to obscurantism [Critchley]
Science gives us an excessively theoretical view of life [Critchley]
Scientism is the view that everything can be explained causally through scientific method [Critchley]
Empirical investigation can't discover if holes exist, or if two things share a colour [Merricks]
Since Kant, philosophers have claimed to understand science better than scientists do [Meillassoux]
Scientism says most knowledge comes from the exact sciences [Hanna]
We should abandon intuitions, especially that the world is made of little things, and made of something [Ladyman/Ross]
The supremacy of science rests on its iterated error filters [Ladyman/Ross]
A metaphysics based on quantum gravity could result in almost anything [Ladyman/Ross]
People who use science to make philosophical points don't realise how philosophical science is [Markosian]
Scientists know everything about nothing, philosophers nothing about everything [Sagan,D]