more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6273

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 7. Testimony ]

Full Idea

Our ability to picture how people are likely to respond may well be innate; indeed, our disposition to believe what other people tell us (which is fundamental to knowledge) could hardly be an inference, as that isn’t good enough for knowledge.

Gist of Idea

Knowledge depends on believing others, which must be innate, as inferences are not strong enough

Source

Hilary Putnam (Meaning and the Moral Sciences [1978], Lec VI)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Meaning and the Moral Sciences' [RKP 1981], p.74


A Reaction

An interesting claim. There could be an intermediate situation, which is a hard-wired non-conscious inference. When dismantled, the 'innate' brain circuits for assessing testimony could turn out to work on logic and evidence.


The 18 ideas with the same theme [role of reports and beliefs of other people in justification]:

We think testimony matches reality because of experience, not some a priori connection [Hume]
Good testimony needs education, integrity, motive and agreement [Hume, by PG]
We treat testimony with a natural trade off of belief and caution [Reid, by Fricker,M]
The reliability of witnesses depends on whether they benefit from their observations [Laplace, by Hacking]
Knowledge depends on believing others, which must be innate, as inferences are not strong enough [Putnam]
Empathy may not give knowledge, but it can give plausibility or right opinion [Putnam]
Unsupported testimony may still be believable [Fine,K]
Vindicating testimony is an expression of individualism [Kusch]
Testimony does not just transmit knowledge between individuals - it actually generates knowledge [Kusch]
Some want to reduce testimony to foundations of perceptions, memories and inferences [Kusch]
Testimony won't reduce to perception, if perception depends on social concepts and categories [Kusch]
A foundation is what is intelligible, hence from a rational source, and tending towards truth [Kusch]
Testimony is an area in which epistemology meets ethics [Kusch]
Powerless people are assumed to be unreliable, even about their own lives [Kusch]
Burge says we are normally a priori entitled to believe testimony [Fricker,M]
We assess testimonial probabilities by the speaker, the listener, the facts, and the circumstances [Fricker,M]
Testimonial judgement is not logical, but produces reasons and motivations [Fricker,M]
Assessing credibility involves the impact of both the speaker's and the listener's social identity [Fricker,M]