more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6274

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 7. Testimony ]

Full Idea

Empathy with others may give less than 'Knowledge', but it gives more than mere logical or physical possibility; it gives plausibility, or (to revive Platonic terminology) it provides 'right opinion'.

Gist of Idea

Empathy may not give knowledge, but it can give plausibility or right opinion

Source

Hilary Putnam (Meaning and the Moral Sciences [1978], Lec VI)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Meaning and the Moral Sciences' [RKP 1981], p.75


A Reaction

See Ideas 174 and 2140 for Plato. Putnam is exploring areas of knowledge outside the limits of strict science. Behind this claim seems to lie the Principle of Charity (3971), but a gang of systematic liars (e.g. evil students) would be a problem case.

Related Ideas

Idea 174 True opinion without reason is midway between wisdom and ignorance [Plato]

Idea 2140 True belief without knowledge is like blind people on the right road [Plato]

Idea 3971 There is simply no alternative to the 'principle of charity' in interpreting what others do [Davidson]


The 18 ideas with the same theme [role of reports and beliefs of other people in justification]:

We think testimony matches reality because of experience, not some a priori connection [Hume]
Good testimony needs education, integrity, motive and agreement [Hume, by PG]
We treat testimony with a natural trade off of belief and caution [Reid, by Fricker,M]
The reliability of witnesses depends on whether they benefit from their observations [Laplace, by Hacking]
Knowledge depends on believing others, which must be innate, as inferences are not strong enough [Putnam]
Empathy may not give knowledge, but it can give plausibility or right opinion [Putnam]
Unsupported testimony may still be believable [Fine,K]
Vindicating testimony is an expression of individualism [Kusch]
Testimony does not just transmit knowledge between individuals - it actually generates knowledge [Kusch]
Some want to reduce testimony to foundations of perceptions, memories and inferences [Kusch]
Testimony won't reduce to perception, if perception depends on social concepts and categories [Kusch]
A foundation is what is intelligible, hence from a rational source, and tending towards truth [Kusch]
Testimony is an area in which epistemology meets ethics [Kusch]
Powerless people are assumed to be unreliable, even about their own lives [Kusch]
Burge says we are normally a priori entitled to believe testimony [Fricker,M]
We assess testimonial probabilities by the speaker, the listener, the facts, and the circumstances [Fricker,M]
Testimonial judgement is not logical, but produces reasons and motivations [Fricker,M]
Assessing credibility involves the impact of both the speaker's and the listener's social identity [Fricker,M]