more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6297

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 2. Geometry ]

Full Idea

Euclid's geometry is a synthetic geometry; Descartes supplied an analytic version of Euclid's geometry, and we now have analytic versions of the early non-Euclidean geometries.

Clarification

'Synthetic' relates to experience; 'analytic' is pure definitions

Gist of Idea

Euclid's geometry is synthetic, but Descartes produced an analytic version of it

Source

report of Euclid (Elements of Geometry [c.290 BCE]) by Michael D. Resnik - Maths as a Science of Patterns One.4

Book Ref

Resnik,Michael D.: 'Mathematics as a Science of Patterns' [OUP 1999], p.55


A Reaction

I take it that the original Euclidean axioms were observations about the nature of space, but Descartes turned them into a set of pure interlocking definitions which could still function if space ceased to exist.


The 12 ideas from Euclid

Postulate 2 says a line can be extended continuously [Euclid, by Shapiro]
Euclid relied on obvious properties in diagrams, as well as on his axioms [Potter on Euclid]
Euclid's parallel postulate defines unique non-intersecting parallel lines [Euclid, by Friend]
Euclid needs a principle of continuity, saying some lines must intersect [Shapiro on Euclid]
Euclid says we can 'join' two points, but Hilbert says the straight line 'exists' [Euclid, by Bernays]
Modern geometries only accept various parts of the Euclid propositions [Russell on Euclid]
Proof reveals the interdependence of truths, as well as showing their certainty [Euclid, by Frege]
If you pick an arbitrary triangle, things proved of it are true of all triangles [Euclid, by Lemmon]
An assumption that there is a largest prime leads to a contradiction [Euclid, by Brown,JR]
Euclid's geometry is synthetic, but Descartes produced an analytic version of it [Euclid, by Resnik]
A unit is that according to which each existing thing is said to be one [Euclid]
Euclid's common notions or axioms are what we must have if we are to learn anything at all [Euclid, by Roochnik]