more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6341

[filed under theme 19. Language / F. Communication / 6. Interpreting Language / b. Indeterminate translation ]

Full Idea

The right translation between words of two languages is the mapping that preserves basic patterns of usage - where usage is characterised non-semantically, in terms of circumstances of application, assertibility conditions and inferential role.

Gist of Idea

Right translation is a mapping of languages which preserves basic patterns of usage

Source

Paul Horwich (Truth (2nd edn) [1990], Ch.6.32)

Book Ref

Horwich,Paul: 'Truth (2nd edn)' [OUP 1998], p.93


A Reaction

It still strikes me that if you ask why a piece of language is used in a certain way, you find yourself facing something deeper about meaning than mere usage. Horwich cites Wittgenstein and Quine in his support. Could a machine pass his test?


The 19 ideas with the same theme [full translation may be a logical impossibility]:

The doctrine of indeterminacy of translation seems implied by the later Wittgenstein [Wittgenstein, by Quine]
Indeterminacy translating 'rabbit' depends on translating individuation terms [Quine]
You could know the complete behavioural conditions for a foreign language, and still not know their beliefs [Quine]
Translation of our remote past or language could be as problematic as alien languages [Quine]
Indeterminacy of translation also implies indeterminacy in interpreting people's mental states [Dennett on Quine]
The firmer the links between sentences and stimuli, the less translations can diverge [Quine]
We can never precisely pin down how to translate the native word 'Gavagai' [Quine]
Stimulus synonymy of 'Gavagai' and 'Rabbit' does not even guarantee they are coextensive [Quine]
Dispositions to speech behaviour, and actual speech, are never enough to fix any one translation [Quine]
The correct translation is the one that explains the speaker's behaviour [Putnam]
Language maps the world in many ways (because it maps onto other languages in many ways) [Putnam]
There are infinitely many interpretations of a sentence which can all seem to be 'correct' [Putnam]
Criteria of translation give us the identity of conceptual schemes [Davidson]
Should we assume translation to define truth, or the other way around? [Blackburn on Davidson]
Shared Background makes translation possible, though variation makes it hard [Searle]
Many predicates totally resist translation, so a universal underlying structure to languages is unlikely [Harman]
Indeterminacy of translation is actually indeterminacy of meaning and belief [Bonjour]
There is an indeterminacy in juggling apparent meanings against probable beliefs [Dancy,J]
Right translation is a mapping of languages which preserves basic patterns of usage [Horwich]