more on this theme
|
more from this text
Single Idea 6352
[filed under theme 14. Science / C. Induction / 1. Induction
]
Full Idea
Enumerative induction examines a sample of objects, observes they all have a property, and infers that they all have that property; statistical induction observes a proportion of the objects having the property, and infers that proportion in general.
Gist of Idea
Enumerative induction gives a universal judgement, while statistical induction gives a proportion
Source
J Pollock / J Cruz (Contemporary theories of Knowledge (2nd) [1999], §1.4.6)
Book Ref
Pollock,J.L./Cruz,J: 'Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (2nd)' [Rowman and Littlefield 1999], p.19
A Reaction
There is also induction by elimination, where it is either p or q, and observation keeps saying it isn't p. A small sample is very unreliable, but a huge sample (e.g. cigarettes and cancer) is almost certain, so where is the small/huge boundary?
Related Ideas
Idea 4800
Natural laws result from eliminative induction, where enumerative induction gives generalisations [Cohen,LJ, by Psillos]
Idea 18610
'Ampliative' induction infers that all members of a category have a feature found in some of them [Machery]
The
22 ideas
from J Pollock / J Cruz
6346
|
The main epistemological theories are foundationalist, coherence, probabilistic and reliabilist
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6351
|
Most people now agree that our reasoning proceeds defeasibly, rather than deductively
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6352
|
Enumerative induction gives a universal judgement, while statistical induction gives a proportion
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6354
|
Coherence theories fail, because they can't accommodate perception as the basis of knowledge
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6355
|
Direct realism says justification is partly a function of pure perceptual states, not of beliefs
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6353
|
People rarely have any basic beliefs, and never enough for good foundations
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6357
|
Reason cannot be an ultimate foundation, because rational justification requires prior beliefs
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6358
|
One belief may cause another, without being the basis for the second belief
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6359
|
Phenomenalism offered conclusive perceptual knowledge, but conclusive reasons no longer seem essential
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6360
|
Scientific confirmation is best viewed as inference to the best explanation
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6361
|
Foundationalism requires self-justification, not incorrigibility
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6362
|
Sense evidence is not beliefs, because they are about objective properties, not about appearances
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6363
|
Foundationalism is wrong, because either all beliefs are prima facie justified, or none are
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6364
|
We can't start our beliefs from scratch, because we wouldn't know where to start
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6365
|
Negative coherence theories do not require reasons, so have no regress problem
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6366
|
Perception causes beliefs in us, without inference or justification
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6367
|
Coherence theories isolate justification from the world
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6370
|
Externalism comes as 'probabilism' (probability of truth) and 'reliabilism' (probability of good cognitive process)
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6371
|
Bayesian epistemology is Bayes' Theorem plus the 'simple rule' (believe P if it is probable)
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6372
|
Since every tautology has a probability of 1, should we believe all tautologies?
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6373
|
Internalism says if anything external varies, the justifiability of the belief does not vary
[Pollock/Cruz]
|
6374
|
To believe maximum truths, believe everything; to have infallible beliefs, believe nothing
[Pollock/Cruz]
|