more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 639

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / A. Syllogistic Logic / 1. Aristotelian Logic ]

Full Idea

Socrates aimed to establish formal logic, of whose syllogisms essences are the foundations. He developed inductive arguments and also general definitions.

Clarification

'Syllogisms' use pure logic, and 'induction' builds on experience

Gist of Idea

Socrates developed definitions as the basis of syllogisms, and also inductive arguments

Source

report of Socrates (reports of career [c.420 BCE]) by Aristotle - Metaphysics 1078b

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Metaphysics', ed/tr. Lawson-Tancred,Hugh [Penguin 1998], p.402


The 15 ideas with the same theme [Aristotle's original account of formal syllogistic logic]:

Socrates developed definitions as the basis of syllogisms, and also inductive arguments [Socrates, by Aristotle]
Aristotle's later logic had to treat 'Socrates' as 'everything that is Socrates' [Potter on Aristotle]
Square of Opposition: not both true, or not both false; one-way implication; opposite truth-values [Aristotle]
Aristotle was the first to use schematic letters in logic [Aristotle, by Potter]
Aristotelian syllogisms are three-part, subject-predicate, existentially committed, with laws of thought [Aristotle, by Hanna]
Aristotelian sentences are made up by one of four 'formative' connectors [Aristotle, by Engelbretsen]
Aristotelian identified 256 possible syllogisms, saying that 19 are valid [Aristotle, by Devlin]
Aristotle replaced Plato's noun-verb form with unions of pairs of terms by one of four 'copulae' [Aristotle, by Engelbretsen/Sayward]
Aristotle listed nineteen valid syllogisms (though a few of them were wrong) [Aristotle, by Devlin]
Modern notation frees us from Aristotle's restriction of only using two class-names in premises [Putnam]
Aristotelian logic is complete [Shapiro]
Aristotelian logic cannot express 'Everyone loves someone' [White,RM]
The four 'perfect syllogisms' are called Barbara, Celarent, Darii and Ferio [Engelbretsen/Sayward]
Syllogistic logic has one rule: what is affirmed/denied of wholes is affirmed/denied of their parts [Engelbretsen/Sayward]
Traditional term logic struggled to express relations [Engelbretsen]