more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 6423

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 6. Logicism / a. Early logicism ]

Full Idea

The primary aim of our 'Principia Mathematica' was to show that all pure mathematics follows from purely logical premisses and uses only concepts definable in logical terms.

Gist of Idea

We tried to define all of pure maths using logical premisses and concepts

Source

Bertrand Russell (My Philosophical Development [1959], Ch.7)

Book Ref

Russell,Bertrand: 'My Philosophical Development' [Routledge 1993], p.57

A Reaction

This spells out the main programme of logicism, by its great hero, Russell. The big question now is whether Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems have succeeded in disproving logicism.

The 33 ideas with the same theme [first developments of the logicist idea]:

14788 Mathematics is close to logic, but is even more abstract [Peirce]
8628 I hold that algebra and number are developments of logic [Jevons]
8487 Arithmetic is a development of logic, so arithmetical symbolism must expand into logical symbolism [Frege]
18165 My Basic Law V is a law of pure logic [Frege]
9945 Logicism shows that no empirical truths are needed to justify arithmetic [Frege, by George/Velleman]
7739 Arithmetic is analytic [Frege, by Weiner]
8782 Frege offered a Platonist version of logicism, committed to cardinal and real numbers [Frege, by Hale/Wright]
13608 Mathematics has no special axioms of its own, but follows from principles of logic (with definitions) [Frege, by Bostock]
16905 Arithmetic must be based on logic, because of its total generality [Frege, by Jeshion]
5658 Numbers are definable in terms of mapping items which fall under concepts [Frege, by Scruton]
8655 Arithmetic is analytic and a priori, and thus it is part of logic [Frege]
18166 The loss of my Rule V seems to make foundations for arithmetic impossible [Frege]
16880 Frege aimed to discover the logical foundations which justify arithmetical judgements [Frege, by Burge]
8689 Eventually Frege tried to found arithmetic in geometry instead of in logic [Frege, by Friend]
17635 Arithmetic can have even simpler logical premises than the Peano Axioms [Russell on Peano]
13414 For Russell, numbers are sets of equivalent sets [Russell, by Benacerraf]
6108 Maths can be deduced from logical axioms and the logic of relations [Russell]
6423 We tried to define all of pure maths using logical premisses and concepts [Russell]
8683 Russell and Whitehead were not realists, but embraced nearly all of maths in logic [Russell/Whitehead, by Friend]
10037 'Principia' lacks a precise statement of the syntax [Gödel on Russell/Whitehead]
10025 Russell and Whitehead took arithmetic to be higher-order logic [Russell/Whitehead, by Hodes]
14103 Pure mathematics is the class of propositions of the form 'p implies q' [Russell]
8748 Logical positivists incorporated geometry into logicism, saying axioms are just definitions [Carnap, by Shapiro]
13936 Questions about numbers are answered by analysis, and are analytic, and hence logically true [Carnap]
11073 Two and one making three has the necessity of logical inference [Wittgenstein]
5202 Maths and logic are true universally because they are analytic or tautological [Ayer]
8993 If mathematics follows from definitions, then it is conventional, and part of logic [Quine]
8788 Logicism is only noteworthy if logic has a privileged position in our ontology and epistemology [Hale/Wright]
10568 Logicists say mathematics can be derived from definitions, and can be known that way [Fine,K]
6408 Russell needed three extra axioms to reduce maths to logic: infinity, choice and reducibility [Grayling]
21723 The task of logicism was to define by logic the concepts 'number', 'successor' and '0' [Linsky,B]
8473 The logicists held that is-a-member-of is a logical constant, making set theory part of logic [Orenstein]
21647 Logicism makes sense of our ability to know arithmetic just by thought [Hofweber]