more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6467

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 4. Sense Data / b. Nature of sense-data ]

Full Idea

No sensibile is ever a datum to two people at once.

Clarification

A 'sensibile' is the singular of 'sensibilia', which seem to be potential sense-data

Gist of Idea

No sensibile is ever a datum to two people at once

Source

Bertrand Russell (The Relation of Sense-Data to Physics [1914], §VII)

Book Ref

Russell,Bertrand: 'Mysticism and Logic' [Unwin 1989], p.152


A Reaction

So a loud bang has to broken down into an almost infinite number of sound sensibilia - each one presumably the size of the apperture of a small ear. This is beginning to sound a bit silly.


The 18 ideas from 'The Relation of Sense-Data to Physics'

Russell held that we are aware of states of our own brain [Russell, by Robinson,H]
Sense-data are qualities devoid of subjectivity, which are the basis of science [Russell, by Deleuze/Guattari]
We do not know whether sense-data exist as objects when they are not data [Russell]
Individuating sense-data is difficult, because they divide when closely attended to [Russell]
'Sensibilia' are identical to sense-data, without actually being data for any mind [Russell]
Ungiven sense-data can no more exist than unmarried husbands [Russell]
Sense-data are not mental, but are part of the subject-matter of physics [Russell]
Sense-data are objects, and do not contain the subject as part, the way beliefs do [Russell]
Sense-data are usually objects within the body, but are not part of the subject [Russell]
Matter is the limit of appearances as distance from the object diminishes [Russell]
We need not deny substance, but there seems no reason to assert it [Russell]
Where possible, logical constructions are to be substituted for inferred entities [Russell]
No sensibile is ever a datum to two people at once [Russell]
There is 'private space', and there is also the 'space of perspectives' [Russell]
Sense-data may be subjective, if closing our eyes can change them [Russell]
The assumption by physicists of permanent substance is not metaphysically legitimate [Russell]
Continuity is a sufficient criterion for the identity of a rock, but not for part of a smooth fluid [Russell]
Physical things are series of appearances whose matter obeys physical laws [Russell]