more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6479

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 5. Action Dilemmas / c. Omissions ]

Full Idea

Noninterference requires justification as much as interference does.

Gist of Idea

Noninterference requires justification as much as interference does

Source

Thomas Nagel (Equality and Partiality [1991], Ch.10)

Book Ref

Nagel,Thomas: 'Equality and Partiality' [OUP 1995], p.100


A Reaction

I'm not convinced by this, as a simple rule. If I spend my whole life doing just the minimum for my own survival, I don't see why I should have to justify that, and I don't see a state is obliged to justify it either.


The 7 ideas from 'Equality and Partiality'

Noninterference requires justification as much as interference does [Nagel]
In ethics we abstract from our identity, but not from our humanity [Nagel]
A legitimate system is one accepted as both impartial and reasonably partial [Nagel]
Game theory misses out the motivation arising from the impersonal standpoint [Nagel]
I can only universalise a maxim if everyone else could also universalise it [Nagel]
Morality must be motivating, and not because of pre-moral motives [Nagel]
Democracy is opposed to equality, if the poor are not a majority [Nagel]