more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6484

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 3. Representation ]

Full Idea

The representative theory of perception is found in Locke, and is adopted by most moderate empiricists.

Gist of Idea

Most moderate empiricists adopt Locke's representative theory of perception

Source

Howard Robinson (Perception [1994], 1.2)

Book Ref

Robinson,Howard: 'Perception' [Routledge 2001], p.5


A Reaction

This is, I think, my own position. Anything less than fairly robust realism strikes me as being a bit mad (despite Berkeley's endless assertions that he is preaching common sense), and direct realism seems obviously false.


The 26 ideas from Howard Robinson

Sense-data do not have any intrinsic intentionality [Robinson,H]
For idealists and phenomenalists sense-data are in objects; representative realists say they resemble objects [Robinson,H]
If intentional states are intrinsically about other things, what are their own properties? [Robinson,H]
Most moderate empiricists adopt Locke's representative theory of perception [Robinson,H]
When a red object is viewed, the air in between does not become red [Robinson,H]
If objects are not coloured, and neither are sense-contents, we are left saying that nothing is coloured [Robinson,H]
Shape can be experienced in different ways, but colour and sound only one way [Robinson,H]
If secondary qualities match senses, would new senses create new qualities? [Robinson,H]
We say objects possess no intrinsic secondary qualities because physicists don't need them [Robinson,H]
Locke's solidity is not matter, because that is impenetrability and hardness combined [Robinson,H]
An explanation presupposes something that is improbable unless it is explained [Robinson,H]
If all possibilities are equal, order seems (a priori) to need an explanation - or does it? [Robinson,H]
Representative realists believe that laws of phenomena will apply to the physical world [Robinson,H]
If reality just has relational properties, what are its substantial ontological features? [Robinson,H]
Phenomenalism can be theistic (Berkeley), or sceptical (Hume), or analytic (20th century) [Robinson,H]
Can we reduce perception to acquisition of information, which is reduced to causation or disposition? [Robinson,H]
For physicalists, the only relations are spatial, temporal and causal [Robinson,H]
Physicalism cannot allow internal intentional objects, as brain states can't be 'about' anything [Robinson,H]
Sense-data are rejected because they are a veil between us and reality, leading to scepticism [Robinson,H]
'Sense redly' sounds peculiar, but 'senses redly-squarely tablely' sounds far worse [Robinson,H]
Adverbialism sees the contents of sense-experience as modes, not objects [Robinson,H]
If there are only 'modes' of sensing, then an object can no more be red or square than it can be proud or lazy. [Robinson,H]
Sense-data leads to either representative realism or phenomenalism or idealism [Robinson,H]
Representative realists believe some properties of sense-data are shared by the objects themselves [Robinson,H]
Would someone who recovered their sight recognise felt shapes just by looking? [Robinson,H]
Secondary qualities have one sensory mode, but primary qualities can have more [Robinson,H]