more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6525

[filed under theme 11. Knowledge Aims / C. Knowing Reality / 2. Phenomenalism ]

Full Idea

Logical positivist phenomenalism has few supporters these days; ..no one ever seemed clear what the sense-datum equivalent of 'there is a table in the next room' could be.

Gist of Idea

Logical positivists could never give the sense-data equivalent of 'there is a table next door'

Source

comment on A.J. Ayer (Language,Truth and Logic [1936]) by Howard Robinson - Perception IX.4

Book Ref

Robinson,Howard: 'Perception' [Routledge 2001], p.227


A Reaction

But do the critics know what they mean by 'there is a table in the next room'? Does it just mean 'I am hoping there is'? You can't refer to the table in the next room without sticking your ontological neck out - and that is 'best explanation'.


The 41 ideas from 'Language,Truth and Logic'

Humeans rejected the a priori synthetic, and so rejected even Kantian metaphysics [Ayer, by Macdonald,C]
Positivists regard ontology as either meaningless or stipulated [Ayer, by Robinson,H]
Logical positivists could never give the sense-data equivalent of 'there is a table next door' [Robinson,H on Ayer]
Positivists prefer sense-data to objects, because the vocabulary covers both illusions and perceptions [Ayer, by Robinson,H]
Empiricism lacked a decent account of the a priori, until Ayer said it was entirely analytic [O'Grady on Ayer]
All propositions (especially 'metaphysics') must begin with the senses [Ayer]
It is further sense-experience which informs us of the mistakes that arise out of sense-experience [Ayer]
When we ascribe an attribute to a thing, we covertly assert that it exists [Ayer]
Only tautologies can be certain; other propositions can only be probable [Ayer]
Philosophy deals with the questions that scientists do not wish to handle [Ayer]
A sentence is factually significant to someone if they know how to verify its proposition [Ayer]
Factual propositions imply (in conjunction with a few other premises) possible experiences [Ayer]
Tautologies and empirical hypotheses form the entire class of significant propositions [Ayer]
The induction problem is to prove generalisations about the future based on the past [Ayer]
We can't use the uniformity of nature to prove induction, as that would be circular [Ayer]
Critics say analysis can only show the parts, and not their distinctive configuration [Ayer]
Philosophy is a department of logic [Ayer]
Philosophers should abandon speculation, as philosophy is wholly critical [Ayer]
Causal and representative theories of perception are wrong as they refer to unobservables [Ayer]
By changing definitions we could make 'a thing can't be in two places at once' a contradiction [Ayer]
We could verify 'a thing can't be in two places at once' by destroying one of the things [Ierubino on Ayer]
Whether geometry can be applied to reality is an empirical question outside of geometry [Ayer]
To say that a proposition is true a priori is to say that it is a tautology [Ayer]
The main claim of rationalism is that thought is an independent source of knowledge [Ayer]
Maths and logic are true universally because they are analytic or tautological [Ayer]
Empiricism, it is said, cannot account for our knowledge of necessary truths [Ayer]
We cannot analyse the concept of 'truth', because it is simply a mark that a sentence is asserted [Ayer]
Moral intuition is worthless if there is no criterion to decide between intuitions [Ayer]
Ayer defends the emotivist version of expressivism [Ayer, by Smith,M]
To say an act is wrong makes no further statement about it, but merely expresses disapproval [Ayer]
If theism is non-sensical, then so is atheism. [Ayer]
A person with non-empirical attributes is unintelligible. [Ayer]
The 'truths' expressed by theists are not literally significant [Ayer]
My empiricism logically distinguishes analytic and synthetic propositions, and metaphysical verbiage [Ayer]
Other minds are 'metaphysical' objects, because I can never observe their experiences [Ayer]
A conscious object is by definition one that behaves in a certain way, so behaviour proves consciousness [Ayer]
If the self is meaningful, it must be constructed from sense-experiences [Ayer]
Two experiences belong to one self if their contents belong with one body [Ayer]
Empiricists can define personal identity as bodily identity, which consists of sense-contents [Ayer]
The supposed 'gulf' between mind and matter is based on the senseless concept of 'substances' [Ayer]
Material things are constructions from actual and possible occurrences of sense-contents [Ayer]