more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6573

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / D. Justice / 3. Punishment / a. Right to punish ]

Full Idea

A strict retributivist is likely to say that once a crime is paid for, that's that; a deterrence theorist is likely to say that the protection of potential victims overrides the released convict's right to a free and fresh start.

Clarification

'Retributivists' believe in appropriate tit-for-tat punishments

Gist of Idea

Retributivists say a crime can be 'paid for'; deterrentists still worry about potential victims

Source

Robert Fogelin (Walking the Tightrope of Reason [2003], Ch.2)

Book Ref

Fogelin,Robert: 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' [OUP 2004], p.63


A Reaction

Interesting since the retributivist here has the more liberal attitude. Reformists will also have a dilemma when years in prison have failed to reform the convict. Virtue theorists like balance, and sensitively consider our relations with the criminals.


The 21 ideas with the same theme [what grounds the right of the state to punish]:

Punishing a criminal for moral ignorance is the same as punishing someone for being blind [Epictetus]
Perhaps we should persuade culprits that their punishment is just? [Epictetus]
No crime and no punishment without a law [Roman law]
We execute irredeemable people, to protect ourselves, as a deterrent, and ending a bad life [Galen]
Punishment should only be for reform or deterrence [Hobbes]
Reparation and restraint are the only justifications for punishment [Locke]
Punishment should make crime a bad bargain, leading to repentance and deterrence [Locke]
Self-defence is natural, but not the punishment of superiors by inferiors [Locke]
There are natural rewards and punishments, like illness after over-indulgence [Leibniz]
The death penalty is permissible, because its victims enjoyed the protection of that law [Montesquieu]
If religion teaches determinism, penalties must be severe; if free will, then that is different [Montesquieu]
We accept the death penalty to prevent assassinations, so we must submit to it if necessary [Rousseau]
A trial proves that a criminal has broken the social treaty, and is no longer a member of the state [Rousseau]
Justice asserts the death penalty for murder, from a priori laws [Kant]
Society can punish actions which it believes to be prejudicial to others [Mill]
Get rid of the idea of punishment! It is a noxious weed! [Nietzsche]
Reasons that justify punishment can also justify the crime [Nietzsche]
Execution is worse than murder, because we are using the victim, and really we are the guilty [Nietzsche]
To punish people we must ourselves be innocent - but that undermines the desire to punish [Weil]
Deterrence, prevention, rehabilitation and retribution can come into conflict in punishments [Fogelin]
Retributivists say a crime can be 'paid for'; deterrentists still worry about potential victims [Fogelin]