more on this theme
|
more from this text
Single Idea 6599
[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 8. Social Justification
]
Full Idea
If we see knowing not as having an essence, described by scientists or philosophers, but rather as a right, by current standards, to believe, then we see conversation as the ultimate context within which knowledge is to be understood.
Gist of Idea
Knowing has no definable essence, but is a social right, found in the context of conversations
Source
Richard Rorty (Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature [1980], Ch.5), quoted by Robert Fogelin - Walking the Tightrope of Reason Ch.5
Book Ref
Fogelin,Robert: 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' [OUP 2004], p.126
A Reaction
This teeters towards ridiculous relativism (e.g. what if the conversation is among a group of fools? - Ah, there are no fools! Politically incorrect!). However, knowledge can be social, provided we are healthily elitist. Scientists know more than us.
The
16 ideas
from Richard Rorty
19090
|
If we can't check our language against experience, philosophy is just comparing beliefs and words
[Rorty]
|
4726
|
Rorty seems to view truth as simply being able to hold one's view against all comers
[Rorty, by O'Grady]
|
2549
|
For James truth is "what it is better for us to believe" rather than a correct picture of reality
[Rorty]
|
2548
|
If knowledge is merely justified belief, justification is social
[Rorty]
|
2550
|
Pain lacks intentionality; beliefs lack qualia
[Rorty]
|
2554
|
Is intentionality a special sort of function?
[Rorty]
|
2553
|
The mind is a property, or it is baffling
[Rorty]
|
2556
|
Rational certainty may be victory in argument rather than knowledge of facts
[Rorty]
|
2557
|
Analytical philosophy seems to have little interest in how to tell a good analysis from a bad one
[Rorty]
|
2558
|
Since Hegel we have tended to see a human as merely animal if it is outside a society
[Rorty]
|
2559
|
Davidson's theory of meaning focuses not on terms, but on relations between sentences
[Rorty]
|
2560
|
Can meanings remain the same when beliefs change?
[Rorty]
|
2562
|
A theory of reference seems needed to pick out objects without ghostly inner states
[Rorty]
|
2565
|
Nature has no preferred way of being represented
[Rorty]
|
2566
|
You can't debate about whether to have higher standards for the application of words
[Rorty]
|
6599
|
Knowing has no definable essence, but is a social right, found in the context of conversations
[Rorty]
|