more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6604

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / C. Artistic Issues / 5. Objectivism in Art ]

Full Idea

"It is all a matter of taste" may be an all-purpose stopper of discussions of aesthetic values, but it also completely severs the connection with the actual properties of the object under consideration.

Gist of Idea

Saying 'It's all a matter to taste' ignores the properties of the object discussed

Source

Robert Fogelin (Walking the Tightrope of Reason [2003], Ch.6)

Book Ref

Fogelin,Robert: 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' [OUP 2004], p.146


A Reaction

This remark grows out of his discussion of Hume. I like this remark, which ties in with Particularism in morality, and with the central role of experiments in science. The world forces beliefs on us.


The 8 ideas with the same theme [possibility that aesthetic judgements can be true]:

The collective judgement of many people on art is better than that of an individual [Aristotle]
One man's meat is another man's poison [Lucretius]
Aesthetic values are not objectively valid, but we must treat them as if they are [Kant, by Scruton]
The judgement of beauty is not cognitive, but relates, via imagination, to pleasurable feelings [Kant]
Schopenhauer emphasises Ideas in art, unlike most romantics [Schopenhauer, by Lewis,PB]
We can be objective about conventions, but love of art is needed to understand its traditions [Scruton]
Aesthetic objectivists must explain pleasure being essential, but not in the object [Gardner]
Saying 'It's all a matter to taste' ignores the properties of the object discussed [Fogelin]