more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6605

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 3. Taste ]

Full Idea

Critics must become causally entangled with their subject matter.

Gist of Idea

Critics must be causally entangled with their subject matter

Source

Robert Fogelin (Walking the Tightrope of Reason [2003], Ch.6)

Book Ref

Fogelin,Robert: 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' [OUP 2004], p.147


A Reaction

This remark is built on Hume's views. You may have a strong view about a singer, but it may be hard to maintain when someone plays you six rival versions of the same piece. I agree entirely with the remark. It means there are aesthetic experts.


The 11 ideas with the same theme [nature and status of good taste]:

If would be absurd not to disagree with someone's taste if it was a taste for poisons [Leibniz]
Strong sense, delicate sentiment, practice, comparisons, and lack of prejudice, are all needed for good taste [Hume]
There are axioms of taste - such as a general consensus about a beautiful face [Reid]
With respect to the senses, taste is an entirely personal matter [Kant]
When we judge beauty, it isn't just personal; we judge on behalf of everybody [Kant]
Saying everyone has their own taste destroys the very idea of taste [Kant]
Why are the strong tastes of other people so contagious? [Nietzsche]
Taste is the capacity to judge an object or representation which is thought to be beautiful [Tarski, by Schellekens]
Literary meaning emerges in comparisons, and tradition shows which comparisons are relevant [Scruton]
Critics must be causally entangled with their subject matter [Fogelin]
The faculty of 'taste' was posited to explain why only some people had aesthetic appreciation [Davies,S]