more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6634

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 1. Physical Mind ]

Full Idea

Physicalists will, it seems, be committed to the notion of narrow content, because if a person and their counterpart are neurological duplicates, they must exemplify the same mental state types, and thus possess beliefs with the same contents.

Gist of Idea

Physicalists must believe in narrow content (because thoughts are merely the brain states)

Source

E.J. Lowe (Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind [2000], Ch. 4)

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind' [CUP 2000], p.89


A Reaction

Very important. How many philosophers currently believe in both wide content and reductive physicalism? However, if content is physical brain-plus-environment, we might reply that the whole package must be identical for same content. Cf Idea 7884!

Related Idea

Idea 7884 Most reductive accounts of representation imply broad content [Papineau]


The 45 ideas from 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind'

The main questions are: is mind distinct from body, and does it have unique properties? [Lowe]
If propositions are abstract entities, how can minds depend on their causal powers? [Lowe]
A 'substance' is a thing that remains the same when its properties change [Lowe]
Perhaps 'I' no more refers than the 'it' in 'it is raining' [Lowe]
'Phenomenal' consciousness is of qualities; 'apperceptive' consciousness includes beliefs and desires [Lowe]
If qualia are causally inert, how can we even know about them? [Lowe]
Functionalism can't distinguish our experiences in spectrum inversion [Lowe]
Functionalism only discusses relational properties of mental states, not intrinsic properties [Lowe]
You can only identify behaviour by ascribing belief, so the behaviour can't explain the belief [Lowe]
Functionalism commits us to bizarre possibilities, such as 'zombies' [Lowe]
Non-reductive physicalism accepts token-token identity (not type-type) and asserts 'supervenience' of mind and brain [Lowe]
Eliminativism is incoherent if it eliminates reason and truth as well as propositional attitudes [Lowe]
Physicalists must believe in narrow content (because thoughts are merely the brain states) [Lowe]
The naturalistic views of how content is created are the causal theory and the teleological theory [Lowe]
Twin Earth cases imply that even beliefs about kinds of stuff are indexical [Lowe]
The same proposition provides contents for the that-clause of an utterance and a belief [Lowe]
Causal theories of belief make all beliefs true, and can't explain belief about the future [Lowe]
How could one paraphrase very complex sense-data reports adverbially? [Lowe]
Psychologists say illusions only occur in unnatural and passive situations [Lowe]
Externalists say minds depend on environment for their very existence and identity [Lowe]
'Ecological' approaches say we don't infer information, but pick it up directly from reality [Lowe]
One must be able to visually recognise a table, as well as knowing its form [Lowe]
Computationalists object that the 'ecological' approach can't tell us how we get the information [Lowe]
The 'disjunctive' theory of perception says true perceptions and hallucinations need have nothing in common [Lowe]
A causal theorist can be a direct realist, if all objects of perception are external [Lowe]
If blindsight shows we don't need perceptual experiences, the causal theory is wrong [Lowe]
The brain may have two systems for vision, with only the older one intact in blindsight [Lowe]
Comparing shapes is proportional in time to the angle of rotation [Lowe]
Some behaviourists believe thought is just suppressed speech [Lowe]
People are wildly inaccurate in estimating probabilities about an observed event [Lowe]
'Base rate neglect' makes people favour the evidence over its background [Lowe]
The 'Frame Problem' is how to program the appropriate application of general knowledge [Lowe]
Syntactical methods of proof need only structure, where semantic methods (truth-tables) need truth [Lowe]
The Turing test is too behaviourist, and too verbal in its methods [Lowe]
A computer program is equivalent to the person AND the manual [Lowe]
The three main theories of action involve the will, or belief-plus-desire, or an agent [Lowe]
Libet gives empirical support for the will, as a kind of 'executive' mental operation [Lowe]
We feel belief and desire as reasons for choice, not causes of choice [Lowe]
People's actions are explained either by their motives, or their reasons, or the causes [Lowe]
Computers can't be rational, because they lack motivation and curiosity [Lowe]
Persons are selves - subjects of experience, with reflexive self-knowledge [Lowe]
If my brain could survive on its own, I cannot be identical with my whole body [Lowe]
It seems impossible to get generally applicable mental concepts from self-observation [Lowe]
All human languages have an equivalent of the word 'I' [Lowe]
There are memories of facts, memories of practical skills, and autobiographical memory [Lowe]