more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6645

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 7. Causal Perception ]

Full Idea

If we don't need to have perceptual experiences in order to see things (as 'blindsight' might suggest), the causal theory of perception cannot be correct.

Clarification

'Blindsight' is where a patient picks up visual information while thinking he or she is blind

Gist of Idea

If blindsight shows we don't need perceptual experiences, the causal theory is wrong

Source

E.J. Lowe (Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind [2000], Ch. 6)

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind' [CUP 2000], p.156


A Reaction

This is because the causal theory implies a chain of events culminating in experience as the last stage. There is no suggestion, though, that unconscious perception would be non-causal, as it bypasses all the problems about consciousness.


The 45 ideas from 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind'

The main questions are: is mind distinct from body, and does it have unique properties? [Lowe]
If propositions are abstract entities, how can minds depend on their causal powers? [Lowe]
A 'substance' is a thing that remains the same when its properties change [Lowe]
Perhaps 'I' no more refers than the 'it' in 'it is raining' [Lowe]
'Phenomenal' consciousness is of qualities; 'apperceptive' consciousness includes beliefs and desires [Lowe]
If qualia are causally inert, how can we even know about them? [Lowe]
Functionalism can't distinguish our experiences in spectrum inversion [Lowe]
Functionalism only discusses relational properties of mental states, not intrinsic properties [Lowe]
You can only identify behaviour by ascribing belief, so the behaviour can't explain the belief [Lowe]
Functionalism commits us to bizarre possibilities, such as 'zombies' [Lowe]
Non-reductive physicalism accepts token-token identity (not type-type) and asserts 'supervenience' of mind and brain [Lowe]
Eliminativism is incoherent if it eliminates reason and truth as well as propositional attitudes [Lowe]
Physicalists must believe in narrow content (because thoughts are merely the brain states) [Lowe]
The naturalistic views of how content is created are the causal theory and the teleological theory [Lowe]
Twin Earth cases imply that even beliefs about kinds of stuff are indexical [Lowe]
The same proposition provides contents for the that-clause of an utterance and a belief [Lowe]
Causal theories of belief make all beliefs true, and can't explain belief about the future [Lowe]
How could one paraphrase very complex sense-data reports adverbially? [Lowe]
Psychologists say illusions only occur in unnatural and passive situations [Lowe]
Externalists say minds depend on environment for their very existence and identity [Lowe]
'Ecological' approaches say we don't infer information, but pick it up directly from reality [Lowe]
One must be able to visually recognise a table, as well as knowing its form [Lowe]
Computationalists object that the 'ecological' approach can't tell us how we get the information [Lowe]
The 'disjunctive' theory of perception says true perceptions and hallucinations need have nothing in common [Lowe]
A causal theorist can be a direct realist, if all objects of perception are external [Lowe]
If blindsight shows we don't need perceptual experiences, the causal theory is wrong [Lowe]
The brain may have two systems for vision, with only the older one intact in blindsight [Lowe]
Comparing shapes is proportional in time to the angle of rotation [Lowe]
Some behaviourists believe thought is just suppressed speech [Lowe]
People are wildly inaccurate in estimating probabilities about an observed event [Lowe]
'Base rate neglect' makes people favour the evidence over its background [Lowe]
The 'Frame Problem' is how to program the appropriate application of general knowledge [Lowe]
Syntactical methods of proof need only structure, where semantic methods (truth-tables) need truth [Lowe]
The Turing test is too behaviourist, and too verbal in its methods [Lowe]
A computer program is equivalent to the person AND the manual [Lowe]
The three main theories of action involve the will, or belief-plus-desire, or an agent [Lowe]
Libet gives empirical support for the will, as a kind of 'executive' mental operation [Lowe]
We feel belief and desire as reasons for choice, not causes of choice [Lowe]
People's actions are explained either by their motives, or their reasons, or the causes [Lowe]
Computers can't be rational, because they lack motivation and curiosity [Lowe]
Persons are selves - subjects of experience, with reflexive self-knowledge [Lowe]
If my brain could survive on its own, I cannot be identical with my whole body [Lowe]
It seems impossible to get generally applicable mental concepts from self-observation [Lowe]
All human languages have an equivalent of the word 'I' [Lowe]
There are memories of facts, memories of practical skills, and autobiographical memory [Lowe]