more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6650

[filed under theme 18. Thought / D. Concepts / 2. Origin of Concepts / c. Nativist concepts ]

Full Idea

Fodor has recently changed his mind about the innateness of concepts, which he formerly championed.

Gist of Idea

Fodor is now less keen on the innateness of concepts

Source

report of Jerry A. Fodor (Concepts:where cogn.science went wrong [1998]) by E.J. Lowe - Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind Ch.7 n25

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind' [CUP 2000], p.188


A Reaction

There is some sensible middle road to be charted here. We presumably do not have an innate idea of a screwdriver, but there are plenty of basic concepts in logic and perception that are plausibly thought of as innate.


The 12 ideas from 'Concepts:where cogn.science went wrong'

Fodor is now less keen on the innateness of concepts [Fodor, by Lowe]
English has no semantic theory, just associations between sentences and thoughts [Fodor]
Empiricists use dispositions reductively, as 'possibility of sensation' or 'possibility of experimental result' [Fodor]
Associationism can't explain how truth is preserved [Fodor]
Mental representations are the old 'Ideas', but without images [Fodor]
I prefer psychological atomism - that concepts are independent of epistemic capacities [Fodor]
It is essential to the concept CAT that it be satisfied by cats [Fodor]
We have no successful definitions, because they all use indefinable words [Fodor]
If 'exist' is ambiguous in 'chairs and numbers exist', that mirrors the difference between chairs and numbers [Fodor]
Definable concepts have constituents, which are necessary, individuate them, and demonstrate possession [Fodor]
Many concepts lack prototypes, and complex prototypes aren't built from simple ones [Fodor]
The theory theory can't actually tell us what concepts are [Fodor]