more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6664

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 3. Acting on Reason / c. Reasons as causes ]

Full Idea

It can be argued (by Davidson) that far from it being the case that reasons for and causes of action are quite distinct, reasons must be causes when agents act 'for' reasons.

Gist of Idea

Reasons must be causes when agents act 'for' reasons

Source

report of Donald Davidson (Action, Reasons and Causes [1963]) by E.J. Lowe - Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind Ch.9

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind' [CUP 2000], p.259


A Reaction

Lowe argues against this view. The rival views to Davidson would be either that reasons are no more than desires-plus-beliefs in disguise, or that the will causes actions, and strong reasons carry a great weight with the will. I like the will.


The 22 ideas with the same theme [reasons have a distinct causal role in actions]:

Our reasoned acts are held to be voluntary and our own doing [Aristotle]
We assign the cause of someone's walking when we say why they are doing it [Aristotle]
Motivation is causality seen from within [Schopenhauer]
I want to suppress in myself the normal reasons people have for action [Cioran]
It is an odd Humean view to think a reason to act must always involve caring [Foot]
The best explanation of reasons as purposes for actions is that they are causal [Davidson, by Smith,M]
Reasons can give purposes to actions, without actually causing them [Smith,M on Davidson]
Early Davidson says intentional action is caused by reasons [Davidson, by Stout,R]
Reasons must be causes when agents act 'for' reasons [Davidson, by Lowe]
Davidson claims that what causes an action is the reason for doing it [Davidson, by Kim]
Deviant causal chain: a reason causes an action, but isn't the reason for which it was performed [Davidson, by Neta]
Reasons are 'internal' if they give a person a motive to act, but 'external' otherwise [Williams,B]
Explaining an action is showing that it is rational [Newton-Smith]
Actions are not mere effects of reasons, but are under their control [Audi,R]
We feel belief and desire as reasons for choice, not causes of choice [Lowe]
Rational decisions are either taken to be based on evidence, or to be explained causally [Conee/Feldman]
Beliefs, desires and intentions are not events, so can't figure in causal relations [Stout,R]
A standard view says that the explanation of an action is showing its rational justification [Stout,R]
In order to be causal, an agent's reasons must be internalised as psychological states [Stout,R]
It is generally assumed that reason explanations are causal [Wilson/Schpall]
Causalists allow purposive explanations, but then reduce the purpose to the action's cause [Wilson/Schpall]
Rather than requiring an action, a reason may 'entice' us, or be 'eligible', or 'justify' it [Orsi]