more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6672

[filed under theme 11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 4. Belief / c. Aim of beliefs ]

Full Idea

Moore's Paradox says it makes no sense to assert 'I believe that p, but p is false', even though it makes perfectly good sense to assert 'I used to believe p, but p is false' or 'You believe p, but p is false'.

Gist of Idea

Moore's Paradox: you can't assert 'I believe that p but p is false', but can assert 'You believe p but p is false'

Source

report of G.E. Moore (works [1905]) by E.J. Lowe - Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind Ch.10

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind' [CUP 2000], p.292


A Reaction

I'm not sure if this really deserves the label of 'paradox'. I take it as drawing attention to the obvious fact that belief is commitment to truth. I think my assessment that p is true is correct, but your assessment is wrong. ('True' is not redundant!)


The 23 ideas from G.E. Moore

A relation is internal if two things possessing the relation could not fail to be related [Moore,GE, by Heil]
The main aim of philosophy is to describe the whole Universe. [Moore,GE]
Analysis for Moore and Russell is carving up the world, not investigating language [Moore,GE, by Monk]
Moore's 'The Nature of Judgement' (1898) marked the rejection (with Russell) of idealism [Moore,GE, by Grayling]
Moor bypassed problems of correspondence by saying true propositions ARE facts [Moore,GE, by Potter]
Hegelians say propositions defy analysis, but Moore says they can be broken down [Moore,GE, by Monk]
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable, but doesn't understand what a definition is [MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
The Open Question argument leads to anti-realism and the fact-value distinction [Boulter on Moore,GE]
Moore cannot show why something being good gives us a reason for action [MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
Can learning to recognise a good friend help us to recognise a good watch? [MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
Moore's combination of antinaturalism with strong supervenience on the natural is incoherent [Hanna on Moore,GE]
Despite Moore's caution, non-naturalists incline towards intuitionism [Moore,GE, by Smith,M]
The three main values are good, right and beauty [Moore,GE, by Ross]
For Moore, 'right' is what produces good [Moore,GE, by Ross]
Relationships imply duties to people, not merely the obligation to benefit them [Ross on Moore,GE]
It is always an open question whether anything that is natural is good [Moore,GE]
The naturalistic fallacy claims that natural qualties can define 'good' [Moore,GE]
'Right' means 'cause of good result' (hence 'useful'), so the end does justify the means [Moore,GE]
We should ask what we would judge to be good if it existed in absolute isolation [Moore,GE]
The beautiful is whatever it is intrinsically good to admire [Moore,GE]
I can prove a hand exists, by holding one up, pointing to it, and saying 'here is one hand' [Moore,GE]
Arguments that my finger does not exist are less certain than your seeing my finger [Moore,GE]
Moore's Paradox: you can't assert 'I believe that p but p is false', but can assert 'You believe p but p is false' [Moore,GE, by Lowe]