more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6696

[filed under theme 2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 7. Ad Hominem ]

Full Idea

The Ad Hominem Fallacy is to criticise the person proposing an argument rather than the argument itself, as when you say "You would say that", or "Your behaviour contradicts what you just said".

Clarification

'Ad Hominem' is Latin for 'against the man'

Gist of Idea

The Ad Hominem Fallacy criticises the speaker rather than the argument

Source

PG (Db (ideas) [2031])


A Reaction

Nietzsche is very keen on ad hominem arguments, and cheerfully insults great philosophers, but then he doesn't believe there is such a thing as 'pure argument', and he is a relativist.


The 16 ideas from 'Db (ideas)'

Note that "is" can assert existence, or predication, or identity, or classification [PG]
Question-begging assumes the proposition which is being challenged [PG]
Fallacies are errors in reasoning, 'formal' if a clear rule is breached, and 'informal' if more general [PG]
What is true of a set is also true of its members [PG]
The Ad Hominem Fallacy criticises the speaker rather than the argument [PG]
Minimal theories of truth avoid ontological commitment to such things as 'facts' or 'reality' [PG]
Monty Hall Dilemma: do you abandon your preference after Monty eliminates one of the rivals? [PG]
Everything has a probability, something will happen, and probabilities add up [PG]
If reality is just what we perceive, we would have no need for a sixth sense [PG]
If my team is losing 3-1, I have synthetic a priori knowledge that they need two goals for a draw [PG]
Maybe a mollusc's brain events for pain ARE of the same type (broadly) as a human's [PG]
Maybe a frog's brain events for fear are functionally like ours, but not phenomenally [PG]
Utilitarianism seems to justify the discreet murder of unhappy people [PG]
How could God know there wasn't an unknown force controlling his 'free' will? [PG]
Life is Movement, Respiration, Sensation, Nutrition, Excretion, Reproduction, Growth (MRS NERG) [PG]
An omniscient being couldn't know it was omniscient, as that requires information from beyond its scope of knowledge [PG]