more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6705

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / F. Existentialism / 5. Existence-Essence ]

Full Idea

It is the freedom to transcend our nature which eudaimonism seems to ignore and existentialism brings to the fore.

Clarification

'Eudaimonism' is Aristotle's aim of fulfilment through virtue

Gist of Idea

Existentialism may transcend our nature, unlike eudaimonism

Source

Gordon Graham (Eight Theories of Ethics [2004], Ch.9)

Book Ref

Graham,Gordon: 'Eight Theories of Ethics' [Routledge 2004], p.178


A Reaction

It is wildly exciting to 'transcend our nature', and very dreary to polish up the nature which is given to us. In this I am a bit conservative. We should not go against the grain, but we shouldn't assume current living is the correct line of the grain.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [natures as either malleable or fixed in character]:

Essence must be known before we discuss existence [Descartes]
For Kant, essence is mental and a mere idea, and existence is the senses and mere appearance [Kant, by Feuerbach]
Reason is just abstractions, so our essence needs a subjective 'leap of faith' [Kierkegaard, by Scruton]
Over huge periods of time human character would change endlessly [Nietzsche]
It is absurd to think you can change your own essence, like a garment [Nietzsche]
Being what it is (essentia) must be conceived in terms of Being (existence) [Heidegger]
'Existence precedes essence' means we have no pre-existing self, but create it through existence [Sartre, by Le Poidevin]
Existence before essence (or begin with the subjective) [Sartre]
Existentialism may transcend our nature, unlike eudaimonism [Graham]
Our 'existence' is how we create ourselves, unconstrained by any prior 'essence' [Aho]