more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6773

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / B. Natural Kinds / 2. Defining Kinds ]

Full Idea

The proposal is that if F is a universal appearing in some natural law, then Fs form a natural kind.

Gist of Idea

If F is a universal appearing in a natural law, then Fs form a natural kind

Source

Alexander Bird (Philosophy of Science [1998], Ch.3)

Book Ref

Bird,Alexander: 'Philosophy of Science' [UCL Press 2000], p.113


A Reaction

Such proposals always invite the question 'What is it about F that enables it to be a universal in a natural law?' Nothing can be ultimately defined simply by its role. The character (essence, even) of the thing makes the role possible.


The 9 ideas with the same theme [what exactly is a natural kind?]:

By knowing one piece of clay or gold, you know all of clay or gold [Anon (Upan)]
All water is the same, because of a certain similarity [Aristotle]
Men started with too few particular names, but later had too few natural kind names [Rousseau]
What is true of one piece of copper is true of another (unlike brass) [Peirce]
There are natural kinds of processes [Ellis]
Kinds are arrangements of dispositions [Fetzer]
Natural kinds are defined by their real essence, as in gold having atomic number 79 [Rowlands]
If F is a universal appearing in a natural law, then Fs form a natural kind [Bird]
Maybe two kinds are the same if there is no change of entropy on isothermal mixing [Hendry]