more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6879

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / B. Logical Consequence / 8. Material Implication ]

Full Idea

'Material implication' is a term introduced by Russell which is defined as 'the conjunction of p and not-q is false', but carries a strong implication that p implies q, and so there must be some kind of connection between them, which is misleading.

Gist of Idea

'Material implication' is defined as 'not(p and not-q)', but seems to imply a connection between p and q

Source

Thomas Mautner (Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy [1996], p.270)

Book Ref

Mautner,Thomas: 'Dictionary of Philosophy' [Penguin 1997], p.270


A Reaction

Mautner says statements of the form 'if p then q' are better called 'conditionals' than 'material implications'. Clearly there is a need for more precise terminology here, as the underlying concepts seem simple enough.


The 30 ideas from 'Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy'

'Real' definitions give the essential properties of things under a concept [Mautner]
'Contextual definitions' replace whole statements, not just expressions [Mautner]
Recursive definition defines each instance from a previous instance [Mautner]
A stipulative definition lays down that an expression is to have a certain meaning [Mautner]
Ostensive definitions point to an object which an expression denotes [Mautner]
The fallacy of composition is the assumption that what is true of the parts is true of the whole [Mautner]
'All x are y' is equivalent to 'all non-y are non-x', so observing paper is white confirms 'ravens are black' [Mautner, by PG]
Analytic philosophy studies the unimportant, and sharpens tools instead of using them [Mautner]
Counterfactuals are not true, they are merely valid [Mautner]
Counterfactuals are true if in every world close to actual where p is the case, q is also the case [Mautner]
Counterfactuals say 'If it had been, or were, p, then it would be q' [Mautner]
Counterfactuals presuppose a belief (or a fact) that the condition is false [Mautner]
Maybe counterfactuals are only true if they contain valid inference from premisses [Mautner]
Double effect is the distinction between what is foreseen and what is intended [Mautner]
Double effect acts need goodness, unintended evil, good not caused by evil, and outweighing [Mautner]
Entailment is logical requirement; it may be not(p and not-q), but that has problems [Mautner]
'Essentialism' is opposed to existentialism, and claims there is a human nature [Mautner]
Essentialism is often identified with belief in 'de re' necessary truths [Mautner]
Fallibilism is the view that all knowledge-claims are provisional [Mautner]
Fuzzy logic is based on the notion that there can be membership of a set to some degree [Mautner]
Observing lots of green x can confirm 'all x are green' or 'all x are grue', where 'grue' is arbitrary [Mautner, by PG]
The 'hermeneutic circle' says parts and wholes are interdependent, and so cannot be interpreted [Mautner]
Strict implication says false propositions imply everything, and everything implies true propositions [Mautner]
'Material implication' is defined as 'not(p and not-q)', but seems to imply a connection between p and q [Mautner]
The references of indexicals ('there', 'now', 'I') depend on the circumstances of utterance [Mautner]
A person who 'infers' draws the conclusion, but a person who 'implies' leaves it to the audience [Mautner]
Linguistic philosophy approaches problems by attending to actual linguistic usage [Mautner]
Quantifiers turn an open sentence into one to which a truth-value can be assigned [Mautner]
'Sense-data' arrived in 1910, but it denotes ideas in Locke, Berkeley and Hume [Mautner]
Vagueness seems to be inconsistent with the view that every proposition is true or false [Mautner]