more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6961

[filed under theme 2. Reason / E. Argument / 3. Analogy ]

Full Idea

But wherever you depart, in the least, from the similarity of the cases, you diminish proportionably the evidence; and may at last bring it to a very weak analogy.

Gist of Idea

An analogy begins to break down as soon as the two cases differ

Source

David Hume (Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion [1751], Part 2)

Book Ref

Hume,David: 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion' [Penguin], p.54


The 8 ideas with the same theme [attempting proof by comparison with similar cases]:

Some things cannot be defined, and only an analogy can be given [Aristotle]
All reasoning concerning matters of fact is based on analogy (with similar results of similar causes) [Hume]
An analogy begins to break down as soon as the two cases differ [Hume]
Philosophical examples rarely fit rules properly, and lead to inflexibility [Kant]
You can't infer that because you have a hidden birth-mark, everybody else does [Ayer]
Legal reasoning is analogical, not deductive [Fogelin]
Babylonian thinking used analogy, rather than deduction or induction [Watson]
Don't trust analogies; they are no more than a guideline [Halbach]