more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 7002

[filed under theme 19. Language / D. Propositions / 2. Abstract Propositions / b. Propositions as possible worlds ]

Full Idea

When pressed, philosophers will describe propositions as states of affairs or sets of possible worlds. But wait! Neither sets of possible worlds nor states of affairs - electrons being negatively charged, for instance - have truth values.

Gist of Idea

If propositions are states of affairs or sets of possible worlds, these lack truth values

Source

John Heil (From an Ontological Point of View [2003], Intro)

Book Ref

Heil,John: 'From an Ontological Point of View' [OUP 2005], p.10


A Reaction

I'm not sure that I see a problem. A pure proposition, expressed as, say "there is a giraffe on the roof" only acquires a truth value at the point where you assert it or believe it. There IS a possible world where there is a giraffe on the roof.


The 54 ideas from 'From an Ontological Point of View'

If you begin philosophy with language, you find yourself trapped in it [Heil]
The view that truth making is entailment is misguided and misleading [Heil]
There are levels of organisation, complexity, description and explanation, but not of reality [Heil]
I think of properties as simultaneously dispositional and qualitative [Heil]
Similarity among modes will explain everthing universals were for [Heil]
Trope theorists usually see objects as 'bundles' of tropes [Heil]
Qualia are not extra appendages, but intrinsic ingredients of material states and processes [Heil]
Dispositionality provides the grounding for intentionality [Heil]
If propositions are states of affairs or sets of possible worlds, these lack truth values [Heil]
If a car is a higher-level entity, distinct from its parts, how could it ever do anything? [Heil]
The Picture Theory claims we can read reality from our ways of speaking about it [Heil]
A predicate applies truly if it picks out a real property of objects [Heil]
Objects are substances, which are objects considered as the bearer of properties [Heil]
The reductionist programme dispenses with levels of reality [Heil]
The standard view is that causal sequences are backed by laws, and between particular events [Heil]
Maybe there is only one substance, space-time or a quantum field [Heil]
Concepts don't carve up the world, which has endless overlooked or ignored divisions [Heil]
If the world is theory-dependent, the theories themselves can't be theory-dependent [Heil]
Powers or dispositions are usually seen as caused by lower-level qualities [Heil]
Are a property's dispositions built in, or contingently added? [Heil]
Science is sometimes said to classify powers, neglecting qualities [Heil]
Functionalists say objects can be the same in disposition but differ in quality [Heil]
If properties were qualities without dispositions, they would be undetectable [Heil]
Can we distinguish the way a property is from the property? [Heil]
Properties don't possess ways they are, because that just is the property [Heil]
Objects join sets because of properties; the property is not bestowed by set membership [Heil]
Universals explain one-over-many relations, and similar qualities, and similar behaviour [Heil]
The real natural properties are sparse, but there are many complex properties [Heil]
God does not create the world, and then add the classes [Heil]
A theory with few fundamental principles might still posit a lot of entities [Heil]
Parsimony does not imply the world is simple, but that our theories should try to be [Heil]
How could you tell if the universals were missing from a world of instances? [Heil]
Secondary qualities are just primary qualities considered in the light of their effect on us [Heil]
Realism says some of our concepts 'cut nature at the joints' [Heil]
Similar objects have similar properties; properties are directly similar [Heil]
A theory of universals says similarity is identity of parts; for modes, similarity is primitive [Heil]
Multiple realisability is actually one predicate applying to a diverse range of properties [Heil]
Rather than 'substance' I use 'objects', which have properties [Heil]
Statues and bronze lumps have discernible differences, so can't be identical [Heil]
Do we reduce statues to bronze, or eliminate statues, or allow statues and bronze? [Heil]
Objects only have secondary qualities because they have primary qualities [Heil]
Colours aren't surface properties, because of radiant sources and the colour of the sky [Heil]
Treating colour as light radiation has the implausible result that tomatoes are not red [Heil]
Intentionality now has internalist (intrinsic to thinkers) and externalist (environment or community) views [Heil]
Intentionality is based in dispositions, which are intrinsic to agents, suggesting internalism [Heil]
Externalism is causal-historical, or social, or biological [Heil]
One form of explanation is by decomposition [Heil]
The 'explanatory gap' is used to say consciousness is inexplicable, at least with current concepts [Heil]
Philosophers' zombies aim to show consciousness is over and above the physical world [Heil]
Functionalism cannot explain consciousness just by functional organisation [Heil]
Zombies are based on the idea that consciousness relates contingently to the physical [Heil]
Functionalists deny zombies, since identity of functional state means identity of mental state [Heil]
If the world is just texts or social constructs, what are texts and social constructs? [Heil]
Anti-realists who reduce reality to language must explain the existence of language [Heil]