more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7127

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / B. Contract Ethics / 3. Promise Keeping ]

Full Idea

If all men were good, promising-breaking would not be good, but because they are bad and do not keep their promises to you, you likewise do not have to keep yours to them.

Gist of Idea

If men are good you should keep promises, but they aren't, so you needn't

Source

Niccolo Machiavelli (The Prince [1513], Ch.18)

Book Ref

Machiavelli,Niccolo: 'The Prince, selections from Discourses', ed/tr. Plamenatz,J [Fontana 1972], p.107


A Reaction

A rather depressing proposal to get your promise-breaking in first, based on the pessimistic view that people cannot be improved. The subsequent history of ethics in Europe showed Machiavelli to be wrong. Gentlemen began to keep their word.


The 8 ideas with the same theme [logic and authority of keeping promises]:

Surely you don't return a borrowed weapon to a mad friend? [Plato]
If men are good you should keep promises, but they aren't, so you needn't [Machiavelli]
In the violent state of nature, the merest suspicion is enough to justify breaking a contract [Hobbes]
If lies were ever acceptable, with would undermine all duties based on contract [Kant]
Promise-keeping is bound by the past, and is not concerned with consequences [Ross]
Promises create a new duty to a particular person; they aren't just a strategy to achieve well-being [Ross]
Promise keeping increases reliability, by making deliberation focus on something which would be overlooked [Williams,B]
Promises hold because I give myself a reason, not because it is an institution [Searle]