more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7501

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / B. Value / 2. Values / h. Fine deeds ]

Full Idea

Couldn't everyone's life become a work of art? Why should the lamp or the house be an art object, but not our life?

Gist of Idea

Why couldn't a person's life become a work of art?

Source

Michel Foucault (On the Genealogy of Ethics [1983], p.261)

Book Ref

Foucault,Michel: 'Essential Works 1954-1984 I: Ethics', ed/tr. Rabinow,Paul [Penguin 1994], p.261


A Reaction

This sounds wonderfully appealing until I try to think how I would implement it. The Augustine move, from sinner to saint, is a possibility, but there is nothing good about sin. The Christian ideal, of colossal self-sacrifice, can be very heroic.


The 31 ideas from Michel Foucault

The idea of liberation suggests there is a human nature which has been repressed [Foucault]
Ethics is the conscious practice of freedom [Foucault]
When logos controls our desires, we have actually become the logos [Foucault]
A subject is a form which can change, in (say) political or sexual situations [Foucault]
Philosophy and politics are fundamentally linked [Foucault]
Saying games of truth were merely power relations would be a horrible exaggeration [Foucault]
The aim is not to eliminate power relations, but to reduce domination [Foucault]
Critical philosophy is what questions domination at every level [Foucault]
Power is localised, so we either have totalitarian centralisation, or local politics [Foucault, by Gutting]
Prisons gradually became our models for schools, hospitals and factories [Foucault, by Gutting]
Greeks and early Christians were much more concerned about food than about sex [Foucault]
Early Greeks cared about city and companions; later Greeks concentrated on the self [Foucault]
Why couldn't a person's life become a work of art? [Foucault]
Feelings are not unchanging, but have a history (especially if they are noble) [Foucault]
Foucault can't accept that power is sometimes decent and benign [Foucault, by Scruton]
The big issue since the eighteenth century has been: what is Reason? Its effect, limits and dangers? [Foucault]
Why does knowledge appear in sudden bursts, and not in a smooth continuous development? [Foucault]
Structuralism systematically abstracted the event from sciences, and even from history [Foucault]
History lacks 'meaning', but it can be analysed in terms of its struggles [Foucault]
Marxists denounced power as class domination, but never analysed its mechanics [Foucault]
Power doesn't just repress, but entices us with pleasure, artefacts, knowledge and discourse [Foucault]
Truth doesn't arise from solitary freedom, but from societies with constraints [Foucault]
Every society has a politics of truth, concerning its values, functions, prestige and mechanisms [Foucault]
'Truth' is the procedures for controlling which statements are acceptable [Foucault]
The big question of the Renaissance was how to govern everything, from the state to children [Foucault]
Power is used to create identities and ways of life for other people [Foucault, by Shorten]
Foucault originally felt that liberating reason had become an instrument of domination [Foucault, by Gutting]
Foucault challenges knowledge in psychology and sociology, not in the basic sciences [Foucault, by Gutting]
Unlike Marxists, Foucault explains thought internally, without deference to conscious ideas [Foucault, by Gutting]
The author function of any text is a plurality of selves [Foucault, by Gutting]
Nature is not the basis of rights, but the willingness to risk death in asserting them [Foucault]