more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7573

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / D. Justice / 2. The Law / d. Legal positivism ]

Full Idea

Hobbes was one of the first to propose the view known as 'legal positivism' - that the criterion for deciding whether a rule is a genuine law is entirely formal or procedural

Gist of Idea

The legal positivism of Hobbes said law is just formal or procedural

Source

report of Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan [1651]) by Nicholas Jolley - Leibniz Ch.7

Book Ref

Jolley,Nicholas: 'Leibniz' [Routledge 2005], p.195


A Reaction

This was opposed to the tradition of natural law, deriving from Aquinas. It is part of a picture of values draining out of the world as science comes to dominate. The is/ought distinction is its culmination. Power replaces virtue, and Thrasymachus wins.


The 6 ideas with the same theme [laws as mere human inventions of social rules]:

Grotius ignored elaborate natural law theories, preferring a basic right of self-preservation [Grotius, by Tuck]
The legal positivism of Hobbes said law is just formal or procedural [Hobbes, by Jolley]
The existence of law is one thing, its merits and demerits another [Austin,J]
Hart replaced positivism with the democratic requirement of the people's acceptance [Hart,HLA, by Zimmermann,J]
For positivists law is a matter of form, for naturalists it is a matter of content [Scruton]
Following some laws is not a moral matter; trivial traffic rules, for example [Wolff,J]