more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7594

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 5. Democracy / f. Against democracy ]

Full Idea

The paradox of democracy (emphasised by Rousseau) is that I am compelled by my belief in democracy to embrace conflicting - perhaps even contradictory - opinions. If I believe A, and the majority vote for B, I am committed to enacting them both.

Gist of Idea

Democrats are committed to a belief and to its opposite, if the majority prefer the latter

Source

Roger Scruton (A Dictionary of Political Thought [1982], 'paradox of democracy')

Book Ref

Scruton,Roger: 'A Dictionary of Political Thought' [Pan 1983], p.341


A Reaction

The paradox would have to be resolved by qualifying what exactly one is committed to by being a democrat. I would say I am committed to the right of my opponents to enact a policy with which I disagree.


The 13 ideas with the same theme [reasons for doubting democratic politics]:

Ultimate democracy is tyranny [Aristotle]
If one despises illiterate mechanics individually, they are not worth more collectively [Cicero]
Unfortunately the majority do not tend to favour what is best [Seneca]
Democracy leads to internal strife, as people struggle to maintain or change ways of ruling [Rousseau]
When ministers change the state changes, because they always reverse policies [Rousseau]
Democracy diminishes mankind, making them mediocre and lowering their value [Nietzsche]
Democracy is organisational power in decline [Nietzsche]
In democracy we are more aware of being governed than of our tiny share in government [Russell]
Democratic institutions become impossible in a fanatical democracy [Russell]
On every new question the majority is always wrong at first [Russell]
Unfortunately ordinary voters can't detect insincerity [Russell]
Party politics in a democracy can't avoid an anti-democratic party [Weil]
Democrats are committed to a belief and to its opposite, if the majority prefer the latter [Scruton]