more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
In Field's view reference is a 'physicalistic relation', i.e. a complex causal relation between words or mental representations and objects or sets of objects; it is up to physical science to discover what that physicalistic relation is.
Gist of Idea
Field says reference is a causal physical relation between mental states and objects
Source
report of Hartry Field (Tarski's Theory of Truth [1972]) by Hilary Putnam - Reason, Truth and History Ch.2
Book Ref
Putnam,Hilary: 'Reason, Truth and History' [CUP 1998], p.45
A Reaction
I wouldn't hold your breath while the scientists do their job. If physicalism is right then Field is right, but physics seems no more appropriate for giving a theory of reference than it does for giving a theory of music.
13499 | Tarski reduced truth to reference or denotation [Field,H, by Hart,WD] |
10818 | Tarski really explained truth in terms of denoting, predicating and satisfied functions [Field,H] |
7615 | Field says reference is a causal physical relation between mental states and objects [Field,H, by Putnam] |
10817 | Tarski just reduced truth to some other undefined semantic notions [Field,H] |
10819 | Tarski gives us the account of truth needed to build a group of true sentences in a model [Field,H] |
10820 | In the early 1930s many philosophers thought truth was not scientific [Field,H] |
10825 | The notion of truth is to help us make use of the utterances of others [Field,H] |
10826 | 'Valence' and 'gene' had to be reduced to show their compatibility with physicalism [Field,H] |
10827 | Model theory is unusual in restricting the range of the quantifiers [Field,H] |