more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 7618

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 12. Denial of Properties ]

Full Idea

Some philosophers are so nominalistic that they would deny the existence of such entities as 'properties' altogether; but science itself does not hesitate to talk freely of properties.

Clarification

Nominalist say only particular items exist

Gist of Idea

Very nominalistic philosophers deny properties, though scientists accept them

Source

Hilary Putnam (Reason, Truth and History [1981], Ch.3)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Reason, Truth and History' [CUP 1998], p.69


A Reaction

Maybe scientists aren't very good at ontology? They talk about forces and energy, but don't seem to know what they are. I am inclined to think that we must include properties in the working ontology of humans, but not into strict physics.


The 22 ideas from 'Reason, Truth and History'

Putnam's epistemic notion of truth replaces the realism of correspondence with ontological relativism [Putnam, by O'Grady]
The correspondence theory is wrong, because there is no one correspondence between reality and fact [Putnam, by O'Grady]
If we try to cure the abundance of theories with causal links, this is 'just more theory' [Putnam, by Lewis]
If necessity is always relative to a description in a language, then there is only 'de dicto' necessity [Putnam, by O'Grady]
The word 'inconsiderate' nicely shows the blurring of facts and values [Putnam]
A fact is simply what it is rational to accept [Putnam]
Rationality is one part of our conception of human flourishing [Putnam]
Reference is social not individual, because we defer to experts when referring to elm trees [Putnam]
Concepts are (at least in part) abilities and not occurrences [Putnam]
Neither individual nor community mental states fix reference [Putnam]
Maybe the total mental state of a language community fixes the reference of a term [Putnam]
There are infinitely many interpretations of a sentence which can all seem to be 'correct' [Putnam]
'Water' on Twin Earth doesn't refer to water, but no mental difference can account for this [Putnam]
Naïve operationalism would have meanings change every time the tests change [Putnam]
The sentence 'A cat is on a mat' remains always true when 'cat' means cherry and 'mat' means tree [Putnam]
Intension is not meaning, as 'cube' and 'square-faced polyhedron' are intensionally the same [Putnam]
If cats equal cherries, model theory allows reinterpretation of the whole language preserving truth [Putnam]
Truth is an idealisation of rational acceptability [Putnam]
Before Kant, all philosophers had a correspondence theory of truth [Putnam]
Very nominalistic philosophers deny properties, though scientists accept them [Putnam]
Some kind of objective 'rightness' is a presupposition of thought itself [Putnam]
For ancient Greeks being wise was an ethical value [Putnam]