more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7618

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 12. Denial of Properties ]

Full Idea

Some philosophers are so nominalistic that they would deny the existence of such entities as 'properties' altogether; but science itself does not hesitate to talk freely of properties.

Clarification

Nominalist say only particular items exist

Gist of Idea

Very nominalistic philosophers deny properties, though scientists accept them

Source

Hilary Putnam (Reason, Truth and History [1981], Ch.3)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Reason, Truth and History' [CUP 1998], p.69


A Reaction

Maybe scientists aren't very good at ontology? They talk about forces and energy, but don't seem to know what they are. I am inclined to think that we must include properties in the working ontology of humans, but not into strict physics.


The 138 ideas from Hilary Putnam

Superactors and superspartans count against behaviourism [Putnam, by Searle]
Express natural kinds as a posteriori predicate connections, not as singular terms [Putnam, by Mackie,P]
Putnam bases essences on 'same kind', but same kinds may not share properties [Mackie,P on Putnam]
Using proper names properly doesn't involve necessary and sufficient conditions [Putnam]
I now think reference by the tests of experts is a special case of being causally connected [Putnam]
Natural kind stereotypes are 'strong' (obvious, like tiger) or 'weak' (obscure, like molybdenum) [Putnam]
Science aims at truth, not at 'simplicity' [Putnam]
The Twin Earth theory suggests that intentionality is independent of qualia [Jacquette on Putnam]
If Twins talking about 'water' and 'XYZ' have different thoughts but identical heads, then thoughts aren't in the head [Putnam, by Crane]
We say ice and steam are different forms of water, but not that they are different forms of H2O [Forbes,G on Putnam]
Does 'water' mean a particular substance that was 'dubbed'? [Putnam, by Rey]
If causes are the essence of diseases, then disease is an example of a relational essence [Putnam, by Williams,NE]
Often reference determines sense, and not (as Frege thought) vice versa [Putnam, by Scruton]
Putnam smuggles essentialism about liquids into his proof that water must be H2O [Salmon,N on Putnam]
Archimedes meant by 'gold' the hidden structure or essence of the stuff [Putnam]
The hidden structure of a natural kind determines membership in all possible worlds [Putnam]
I do not believe mathematics either has or needs 'foundations' [Putnam]
Science requires more than consistency of mathematics [Putnam]
You can't deny a hypothesis a truth-value simply because we may never know it! [Putnam]
It is conceivable that the axioms of arithmetic or propositional logic might be changed [Putnam]
Maybe mathematics is empirical in that we could try to change it [Putnam]
We understand some statements about all sets [Putnam]
I can't distinguish elm trees, but I mean by 'elm' the same set of trees as everybody else [Putnam]
Language is more like a cooperative steamship than an individual hammer [Putnam]
If water is H2O in the actual world, there is no possible world where it isn't H2O [Putnam]
Conceivability is no proof of possibility [Putnam]
A statement can be metaphysically necessary and epistemologically contingent [Putnam]
'Water' has an unnoticed indexical component, referring to stuff around here [Putnam]
We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference [Putnam]
Instances of pain are physical tokens, but the nature of pain is more abstract [Putnam, by Lycan]
A culture needs to admit that knowledge is more extensive than just 'science' [Putnam]
We need the correspondence theory of truth to understand language and science [Putnam]
In Tarski's definition, you understand 'true' if you accept the notions of the object language [Putnam]
Tarski has given a correct account of the formal logic of 'true', but there is more to the concept [Putnam]
The claim that scientific terms are incommensurable can be blocked if scientific terms are not descriptions [Putnam]
Only Tarski has found a way to define 'true' [Putnam]
The correct translation is the one that explains the speaker's behaviour [Putnam]
How reference is specified is not what reference is [Putnam]
Knowledge depends on believing others, which must be innate, as inferences are not strong enough [Putnam]
Empathy may not give knowledge, but it can give plausibility or right opinion [Putnam]
'True' and 'refers' cannot be made scientically precise, but are fundamental to science [Putnam]
You can't decide which explanations are good if you don't attend to the interest-relative aspects [Putnam]
Theory of meaning presupposes theory of understanding and reference [Putnam]
Truth conditions can't explain understanding a sentence, because that in turn needs explanation [Putnam]
Language maps the world in many ways (because it maps onto other languages in many ways) [Putnam]
If a tautology is immune from revision, why would that make it true? [Putnam]
Realism is a theory, which explains the convergence of science and the success of language [Putnam]
'The rug is green' might be warrantedly assertible even though the rug is not green [Putnam]
Correspondence between concepts and unconceptualised reality is impossible [Putnam]
A private language could work with reference and beliefs, and wouldn't need meaning [Putnam]
You can't say 'most speaker's beliefs are true'; in some areas this is not so, and you can't count beliefs [Putnam]
We should reject the view that truth is prior to meaning [Putnam]
The Löwenheim-Skolem theorems show that whether all sets are constructible is indeterminate [Putnam, by Shapiro]
The Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem is close to an antinomy in philosophy of language [Putnam]
It is unfashionable, but most mathematical intuitions come from nature [Putnam]
V = L just says all sets are constructible [Putnam]
Neuroscience does not support multiple realisability, and tends to support identity [Polger on Putnam]
If humans and molluscs both feel pain, it can't be a single biological state [Putnam, by Kim]
Temperature is mean molecular kinetic energy, but they are two different concepts [Putnam]
Is pain a functional state of a complete organism? [Putnam]
Functionalism is compatible with dualism, as pure mind could perform the functions [Putnam]
Total paralysis would mean that there were mental states but no behaviour at all [Putnam]
Dispositions need mental terms to define them [Putnam]
Functional states correlate with AND explain pain behaviour [Putnam]
Metaphysical realism is committed to there being one ultimate true theory [Putnam]
An alien might think oxygen was the main cause of a forest fire [Putnam]
It is an illusion to think there could be one good scientific theory of reality [Putnam]
Shape is essential relative to 'statue', but not essential relative to 'clay' [Putnam]
The old view that sense data are independent of mind is quite dotty [Putnam]
Indispensability strongly supports predicative sets, and somewhat supports impredicative sets [Putnam]
Very large sets should be studied in an 'if-then' spirit [Putnam]
We must quantify over numbers for science; but that commits us to their existence [Putnam]
How can you contemplate Platonic entities without causal transactions with them? [Putnam]
The universal syllogism is now expressed as the transitivity of subclasses [Putnam]
For scientific purposes there is a precise concept of 'true-in-L', using set theory [Putnam]
Physics is full of non-physical entities, such as space-vectors [Putnam]
'⊃' ('if...then') is used with the definition 'Px ⊃ Qx' is short for '¬(Px & ¬Qx)' [Putnam]
Modern notation frees us from Aristotle's restriction of only using two class-names in premises [Putnam]
Before the late 19th century logic was trivialised by not dealing with relations [Putnam]
Asserting first-order validity implicitly involves second-order reference to classes [Putnam]
Having a valid form doesn't ensure truth, as it may be meaningless [Putnam]
Nominalism only makes sense if it is materialist [Putnam]
In type theory, 'x ∈ y' is well defined only if x and y are of the appropriate type [Putnam]
Sets larger than the continuum should be studied in an 'if-then' spirit [Putnam]
Most predictions are uninteresting, and are only sought in order to confirm a theory [Putnam]
Unfashionably, I think logic has an empirical foundation [Putnam]
We can identify functions with certain sets - or identify sets with certain functions [Putnam]
The correspondence theory is wrong, because there is no one correspondence between reality and fact [Putnam, by O'Grady]
Putnam's epistemic notion of truth replaces the realism of correspondence with ontological relativism [Putnam, by O'Grady]
If we try to cure the abundance of theories with causal links, this is 'just more theory' [Putnam, by Lewis]
If necessity is always relative to a description in a language, then there is only 'de dicto' necessity [Putnam, by O'Grady]
The word 'inconsiderate' nicely shows the blurring of facts and values [Putnam]
Rationality is one part of our conception of human flourishing [Putnam]
A fact is simply what it is rational to accept [Putnam]
Reference is social not individual, because we defer to experts when referring to elm trees [Putnam]
Concepts are (at least in part) abilities and not occurrences [Putnam]
'Water' on Twin Earth doesn't refer to water, but no mental difference can account for this [Putnam]
Naïve operationalism would have meanings change every time the tests change [Putnam]
Maybe the total mental state of a language community fixes the reference of a term [Putnam]
There are infinitely many interpretations of a sentence which can all seem to be 'correct' [Putnam]
Neither individual nor community mental states fix reference [Putnam]
The sentence 'A cat is on a mat' remains always true when 'cat' means cherry and 'mat' means tree [Putnam]
Intension is not meaning, as 'cube' and 'square-faced polyhedron' are intensionally the same [Putnam]
If cats equal cherries, model theory allows reinterpretation of the whole language preserving truth [Putnam]
Truth is an idealisation of rational acceptability [Putnam]
Before Kant, all philosophers had a correspondence theory of truth [Putnam]
Very nominalistic philosophers deny properties, though scientists accept them [Putnam]
Some kind of objective 'rightness' is a presupposition of thought itself [Putnam]
For ancient Greeks being wise was an ethical value [Putnam]
Truth is rational acceptability [Putnam]
Meaning holism tried to show that you can't get fixed meanings built out of observation terms [Putnam]
Understanding a sentence involves background knowledge and can't be done in isolation [Putnam]
Holism seems to make fixed definition more or less impossible [Putnam]
Reference (say to 'elms') is a social phenomenon which we can leave to experts [Putnam]
Aristotle implies that we have the complete concepts of a language in our heads, but we don't [Putnam]
Reference may be different while mental representation is the same [Putnam]
We should separate how the reference of 'gold' is fixed from its conceptual content [Putnam]
Like names, natural kind terms have their meaning fixed by extension and reference [Putnam]
"Water" is a natural kind term, but "H2O" is a description [Putnam]
If we are going to eliminate folk psychology, we must also eliminate folk logic [Putnam]
Semantic notions do not occur in Tarski's definitions, but assessing their correctness involves translation [Putnam]
Meaning and translation (which are needed to define truth) both presuppose the notion of reference [Putnam]
Asserting the truth of an indexical statement is not the same as uttering the statement [Putnam]
Is there just one computational state for each specific belief? [Putnam]
Realists believe truth is correspondence, independent of humans, is bivalent, and is unique [Putnam]
Aristotle says an object (e.g. a lamp) has identity if its parts stay together when it is moved [Putnam]
The job of the philosopher is to distinguish facts about the world from conventions [Putnam]
"Meaning is use" is not a definition of meaning [Putnam]
Functionalism says robots and people are the same at one level of abstraction [Putnam]
Functionalism can't explain reference and truth, which are needed for logic [Putnam]
Can we give a scientific, computational account of folk psychology? [Putnam]
If concepts have external meaning, computational states won't explain psychology [Putnam]
Putnam coined the term 'if-thenism' [Putnam, by Musgrave]
If everything uses mentalese, ALL concepts must be innate! [Putnam]
No machine language can express generalisations [Putnam]
Mathematics eliminates possibility, as being simultaneous actuality in sets [Putnam]
Putnam says anti-realism is a bad explanation of accurate predictions [Putnam, by Okasha]
Realism is the only philosophy of science that doesn't make the success of science a miracle [Putnam]