more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 7630

[filed under theme 11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 6. Knowing How ]

Full Idea

There is a convincing claim that we need to leave behind Ryle's dichotomy between knowing how and knowing that as being too simplistic.

Gist of Idea

Ryle's dichotomy between knowing how and knowing that is too simplistic

Source

Barry Maund (Perception [2003], Ch. 2)

Book Ref

Maund,Barry: 'Perception' [Acumen 2003], p.29


A Reaction

[John Campbell is mentioned as source of this idea] I find this proposal immediately appealing. I was taught that riding a bicycle shows the division, as hardly anyone knows the theory, but I am sure children need some propositional information.


The 8 ideas from 'Perception'

Ryle's dichotomy between knowing how and knowing that is too simplistic [Maund]
Perception is sensation-then-concept, or direct-concepts, or sensation-saturated-in-concepts [Maund]
Sense-data have an epistemological purpose (foundations) and a metaphysical purpose (explanation) [Maund]
Thought content is either satisfaction conditions, or exercise of concepts [Maund, by PG]
One thesis says we are not aware of qualia, but only of objects and their qualities [Maund]
The Myth of the Given claims that thought is rationally supported by non-conceptual experiences [Maund]
Mountains are adverbial modifications of the earth, but still have object-characteristics [Maund]
Adverbialism tries to avoid sense-data and preserve direct realism [Maund]