more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7691

[filed under theme 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 1. Possible Worlds / a. Possible worlds ]

Full Idea

The actual world is a maximally consistent state-of-affairs combination involving all and only the existent objects, which in turn exist because they are maximally consistent property combinations.

Gist of Idea

The actual world is a consistent combination of states, made of consistent property combinations

Source

Dale Jacquette (Ontology [2002], Ch. 2)

Book Ref

Jacquette,Dale: 'Ontology' [Acumen 2002], p.73


A Reaction

[This extends Idea 7688]. This seems to invite the standard objections to the coherence theory of truth, such as Ideas 5422 and 4745. Is 'maximal consistency' merely a test for actuality, rather than an account of what actuality is?

Related Ideas

Idea 7688 The actual world is a maximally consistent combination of actual states of affairs [Jacquette]

Idea 5422 More than one coherent body of beliefs seems possible [Russell]

Idea 4745 Any coherent set of beliefs can be made more coherent by adding some false beliefs [Engel]


The 31 ideas from Dale Jacquette

Modal logic is multiple systems, shown in the variety of accessibility relations between worlds [Jacquette]
The two main views in philosophy of logic are extensionalism and intensionalism [Jacquette]
Intensionalists say meaning is determined by the possession of properties [Jacquette]
Extensionalists say that quantifiers presuppose the existence of their objects [Jacquette]
Extensionalist semantics forbids reference to nonexistent objects [Jacquette]
Extensionalist semantics is circular, as we must know the extension before assessing 'Fa' [Jacquette]
Classical logic is bivalent, has excluded middle, and only quantifies over existent objects [Jacquette]
Substitutional universal quantification retains truth for substitution of terms of the same type [Jacquette]
Nominalists like substitutional quantification to avoid the metaphysics of objects [Jacquette]
Ontology must include the minimum requirements for our semantics [Jacquette]
Ontology is the same as the conceptual foundations of logic [Jacquette]
An object is a predication subject, distinguished by a distinctive combination of properties [Jacquette]
The actual world is a consistent combination of states, made of consistent property combinations [Jacquette]
The actual world is a maximally consistent combination of actual states of affairs [Jacquette]
Do proposition-structures not associated with the actual world deserve to be called worlds? [Jacquette]
Being is maximal consistency [Jacquette]
Logic is based either on separate objects and properties, or objects as combinations of properties [Jacquette]
Reduce states-of-affairs to object-property combinations, and possible worlds to states-of-affairs [Jacquette]
Existence is completeness and consistency [Jacquette]
Logic is not just about signs, because it relates to states of affairs, objects, properties and truth-values [Jacquette]
Logic describes inferences between sentences expressing possible properties of objects [Jacquette]
The modal logic of C.I.Lewis was only interpreted by Kripke and Hintikka in the 1960s [Jacquette]
On Russell's analysis, the sentence "The winged horse has wings" comes out as false [Jacquette]
Can a Barber shave all and only those persons who do not shave themselves? [Jacquette]
If classes can't be eliminated, and they are property combinations, then properties (universals) can't be either [Jacquette]
The extreme views on propositions are Frege's Platonism and Quine's extreme nominalism [Jacquette]
We must experience the 'actual' world, which is defined by maximally consistent propositions [Jacquette]
Numbers, sets and propositions are abstract particulars; properties, qualities and relations are universals [Jacquette]
If qualia supervene on intentional states, then intentional states are explanatorily fundamental [Jacquette]
Reduction of intentionality involving nonexistent objects is impossible, as reduction must be to what is actual [Jacquette]
To grasp being, we must say why something exists, and why there is one world [Jacquette]