more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7827

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 1. Basis of Rights ]

Full Idea

Spinoza's advocacy of democracy on the basis of individual rights was extraordinarily bold for its time, and it qualifies him as the first truly modern political philosopher.

Gist of Idea

Spinoza wanted democracy based on individual rights, and is thus the first modern political philosopher

Source

comment on Baruch de Spinoza (Tractatus Theologico-Politicus [1670]) by Matthew Stewart - The Courtier and the Heretic Ch. 6

Book Ref

Stewart,Matthew: 'The Courtier and the Heretic' [Yale 2007], p.102


A Reaction

Sounds right. Hobbes may have been the 'first modern man', but his politics was fairly medieval. John Lilburne and co. may have campaigned for rights and democracy, but they weren't really philosophers.


The 43 ideas with the same theme [what can justify giving or withholding rights]:

Sound laws achieve the happiness of those who observe them [Plato]
Law is intelligence without appetite [Aristotle]
It is not a law if not endorsed by the public [Hooker,R]
Spinoza wanted democracy based on individual rights, and is thus the first modern political philosopher [Stewart,M on Spinoza]
The sovereignty has absolute power over citizens [Spinoza]
The loss of perfect rights causes misery, but the loss of imperfect rights reduces social good [Hutcheson]
There are two kinds of right - to power, and to property [Hume]
There is now a growing universal community, and violations of rights are felt everywhere [Kant]
There are political and inter-national rights, but also universal cosmopolitan rights [Kant]
Only laws can produce real rights; rights from 'law of nature' are imaginary [Bentham]
To get duties from people without rights, you must pay them well [Goethe]
The absolute right is the right to have rights [Hegel]
Rights imply duties, and duties imply rights [Hegel]
A right is a valid claim to society's protection [Mill]
Marxists say liberal rights are confrontational, and liberal equality is a sham [Marx, by Wolff,J]
Rights arise out of contracts, which need a balance of power [Nietzsche]
Rights were originally legal, and broadened to include other things [Ross]
Rights are asserted contentiously, and need the backing of force [Weil]
Giving centrality to rights stifles all impulses of charity [Weil]
People have duties, and only have rights because of the obligations of others to them [Weil]
Hart (against Bentham) says human rights are what motivate legal rights [Hart,HLA, by Sen]
The right of non-interference (with a 'negative duty'), and the right to goods/services ('positive') [Foot]
A right is not just a rule, but also asserts certain ideas of moral worth [Taylor,C]
For most people the primacy of rights mainly concerns freedom [Taylor,C]
A morality of rights is very minimal, leaving a lot of human life without restrictions or duties [Nagel]
If whole states possess rights, there can be social relations between states [Walzer]
If a right entails having the relevant desire, many creatures might have no right to life [Singer]
Fans of natural rights or laws can't agree on what the actual rights or laws are [MacIntyre]
Political and civil rights are not separate from economic and social rights [Nussbaum]
The Lockean view of freedom depends on whether you had a right to what is restricted [Kymlicka]
Rights are a part of nation-building, to build a common national identity and culture [Kymlicka]
Rights derived from group membership are opposed to the idea of state citizenship [Kymlicka]
A right is a power which is enforced in the name of justice [Scruton]
Rights are moral significance, or liberty, or right not to be restrained, or entitlement [Mawson]
Standard rights: life, free speech, assembly, movement, vote, stand (plus shelter, food, health?) [Wolff,J]
If natural rights are axiomatic, there is then no way we can defend them [Wolff,J]
If rights are natural, rather than inferred, how do we know which rights we have? [Wolff,J]
Freedom from torture or terrorist attacks is independent of citizenship [Sen]
Liberty Rights are permissions, and Claim Rights are freedom from intervention [McMahan]
Some rights are 'claims' that other people should act in a certain way [Tuckness/Wolf]
Choice theory says protecting individual autonomy is basic (but needs to cover infants and animals) [Tuckness/Wolf]
One theory (fairly utilitarian) says rights protect interests (but it needs to cover trivial interests) [Tuckness/Wolf]
Having a right does not entail further rights needed to implement it [Tuckness/Wolf]