more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7878

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / d. Explanatory gap ]

Full Idea

We cannot give materialist explanations of why brain yields phenomenal properties because phenomenal concepts are not associated with descriptions of causal roles in the same way as pre-theoretical terms in other areas of science.

Gist of Idea

Materialism won't explain phenomenal properties, because the latter aren't seen in causal roles

Source

comment on Joseph Levine (Purple Haze [2001]) by David Papineau - Thinking about Consciousness 5.1

Book Ref

Papineau,David: 'Thinking about Consciousness' [OUP 2004], p.143


A Reaction

I think Papineau has part of the answer, and I certainly like his notion of Conceptual Dualism, but if qualia are physical, there must be a physical account of how they acquire their properties. I think the whole brain needs to be understood first.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [no prospect of fully explaining mind via brain]:

Physicalism should explain how subjective experience is possible, but not 'what it is like' [Kirk,R on Nagel]
If an orange image is a brain state, are some parts of the brain orange? [Kim]
Even if we identify pain with neural events, we can't explain why those neurons cause that feeling [Levine, by Papineau]
Only phenomenal states have an explanatory gap; water is fully explained by H2O [Levine, by Papineau]
Materialism won't explain phenomenal properties, because the latter aren't seen in causal roles [Papineau on Levine]