more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 7892

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 1. Physical Mind ]

Full Idea

Without the completeness of physics, there is no compelling reason to identify the mind with the brain.

Gist of Idea

The completeness of physics is needed for mind-brain identity

Source

David Papineau (Thinking about Consciousness [2002], App 7)

Book Ref

Papineau,David: 'Thinking about Consciousness' [OUP 2004], p.255


A Reaction

Papineau says the completeness of physics was accepted from the 1950s. Why were Epicurus and Hobbes physicalists? Do we have a circularity here? How do you establish the completeness of physics, without asserting mind to be physical?


The 39 ideas from 'Thinking about Consciousness'

Maybe a creature is conscious if its mental states represent things in a distinct way [Papineau]
Most reductive accounts of representation imply broad content [Papineau]
Thinking about a thing doesn't require activating it [Papineau]
Causation is based on either events, or facts, or states of affairs [Papineau]
The only serious mind-brain theories now are identity, token identity, realization and supervenience [Papineau]
Consciousness affects bodily movement, so thoughts must be material states [Papineau]
Whether octopuses feel pain is unclear, because our phenomenal concepts are too vague [Papineau]
It is absurd to think that physical effects are caused twice, so conscious causes must be physical [Papineau]
Causes are instantiations of properties by particulars, or they are themselves basic particulars [Papineau]
If causes are basic particulars, this doesn't make conscious and physical properties identical [Papineau]
The epiphenomenal relation of mind and brain is a 'causal dangler', unlike anything else [Papineau]
Maybe minds do not cause actions, but do cause us to report our decisions [Papineau]
If content hinges on matters outside of you, how can it causally influence your actions? [Papineau]
Maybe mind and body do overdetermine acts, but are linked (for some reason) [Papineau]
Supervenience can be replaced by identifying mind with higher-order or disjunctional properties [Papineau]
Mary acquires new concepts; she previously thought about the same property using material concepts [Papineau]
Truth conditions in possible worlds can't handle statements about impossibilities [Papineau]
Thought content is possible worlds that make the thought true; if that includes the actual world, it's true [Papineau]
Role concepts either name the realising property, or the higher property constituting the role [Papineau]
Perceptual concepts can't just refer to what causes classification [Papineau]
Teleosemantics equates meaning with the item the concept is intended to track [Papineau]
Young children can see that other individuals sometimes have false beliefs [Papineau]
Do we understand other minds by simulation-theory, or by theory-theory? [Papineau]
Mind-brain reduction is less explanatory, because phenomenal concepts lack causal roles [Papineau]
Accept ontological monism, but conceptual dualism; we think in a different way about phenomenal thought [Papineau]
Researching phenomenal consciousness is peculiar, because the concepts involved are peculiar [Papineau]
Verificationists tend to infer indefinite answers from undecidable questions [Papineau]
The 'actualist' HOT theory says consciousness comes from actual higher judgements of mental states [Papineau]
Actualist HOT theories imply that a non-conscious mental event could become conscious when remembered [Papineau]
States are conscious if they could be the subject of higher-order mental judgements [Papineau]
Higher-order judgements may be possible where the subject denies having been conscious [Papineau]
Our concept of consciousness is crude, and lacks theoretical articulation [Papineau]
We can’t decide what 'conscious' means, so it is undecidable whether cats are conscious [Papineau]
Modern biological research, especially into the cell, has revealed no special new natural forces [Papineau]
Quantum 'wave collapses' seem to violate conservation of energy [Papineau]
Determinism is possible without a complete physics, if mental forces play a role [Papineau]
Weak reduction of mind is to physical causes; strong reduction is also to physical laws [Papineau]
The completeness of physics cannot be proved [Papineau]
The completeness of physics is needed for mind-brain identity [Papineau]