more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7962

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 4. Uninstantiated Universals ]

Full Idea

Uninstantiated properties and relations may do some useful philosophical work.

Clarification

'Uninstantiated' means there are no actual cases

Gist of Idea

Uninstantiated properties are useful in philosophy

Source

Alex Oliver (The Metaphysics of Properties [1996], §11), quoted by Cynthia Macdonald - Varieties of Things

Book Ref

Macdonald,Cynthia: 'Varieties of Things' [Blackwell 2005], p.238


A Reaction

Their value isn't just philosophical; hopes and speculations depend on them. This doesn't make universals mind-independent. I think the secret is a clear understanding of the word 'abstract' (which I don't have).


The 13 ideas with the same theme [universals existing apart from their actual instances]:

Duns Scotus was a realist about universals [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
Normal existence is in time, so we must say that universals 'subsist' [Russell]
It is claimed that some universals are not exemplified by any particular, so must exist separately [Armstrong]
Uninstantiated properties must be defined using the instantiated ones [Quinton]
Nominalists cannot translate 'red resembles pink more than blue' into particulars [Jackson]
Uninstantiated properties are useful in philosophy [Oliver]
Uninstantiated universals seem to exist if they themselves have properties [Oliver]
'There are shapes which are never exemplified' is the toughest example for nominalists [Hoffman/Rosenkrantz]
Particulars are instantiations, and universals are instantiables [Lowe]
Maybe universals are real, if properties themselves have properties, and relate to other properties [Moreland]
A naturalist and realist about universals is forced to say redness can be both moving and stationary [Moreland]
There are spatial facts about red particulars, but not about redness itself [Moreland]
How could 'being even', or 'being a father', or a musical interval, exist naturally in space? [Moreland]