more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 7970

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / E. Nominalism / 5. Class Nominalism ]

Full Idea

Armstrong dubs Quine an 'Ostrich Nominalist' (what problem??), but Quine calls himself a Platonist, because he is committed to classes or sets as well as particulars. He is not an extreme nominalist, and might best be called a Class Nominalist.

Gist of Idea

Quine is committed to sets, but is more a Class Nominalist than a Platonist

Source

report of Willard Quine (works [1961], Ch.6 n15) by Cynthia Macdonald - Varieties of Things

Book Ref

Macdonald,Cynthia: 'Varieties of Things' [Blackwell 2005], p.255


A Reaction

For someone as ontologically austere as Quine to show 'commitment' to sets deserves some recognition. If he wants to be a Platonist, I say that's fine. What on earth is a set, apart from its members?


The 29 ideas from 'works'

Quinean metaphysics just lists the beings, which is a domain with no internal structure [Schaffer,J on Quine]
Set theory is full of Platonist metaphysics, so Quine aimed to keep it separate from logic [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
Quine wants V = L for a cleaner theory, despite the scepticism of most theorists [Quine, by Shapiro]
Two things can never entail three things [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
If we had to name objects to make existence claims, we couldn't discuss all the real numbers [Quine]
No sense can be made of quantification into opaque contexts [Quine, by Hale]
Finite quantification can be eliminated in favour of disjunction and conjunction [Quine, by Dummett]
Quine thought substitutional quantification confused use and mention, but then saw its nominalist appeal [Quine, by Marcus (Barcan)]
Universals are acceptable if they are needed to make an accepted theory true [Quine, by Jacquette]
For Quine, intuitionist ontology is inadequate for classical mathematics [Quine, by Orenstein]
Intuitionists only admit numbers properly constructed, but classical maths covers all reals in a 'limit' [Quine, by Orenstein]
Quine wants identity and individuation-conditions for possibilia [Quine, by Lycan]
A logically perfect language could express all truths, so all truths must be logically expressible [Quine, by Hossack]
For Quine everything exists theoretically, as reference, predication and quantification [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
Quine says we can expand predicates easily (ideology), but not names (ontology) [Quine, by Noonan]
Quine says the predicate of a true statement has no ontological implications [Quine, by Armstrong]
Quine suggests that properties can be replaced with extensional entities like sets [Quine, by Shapiro]
Quine says that if second-order logic is to quantify over properties, that can be done in first-order predicate logic [Quine, by Benardete,JA]
Quine brought classes into semantics to get rid of properties [Quine, by McGinn]
Don't analyse 'red is a colour' as involving properties. Say 'all red things are coloured things' [Quine, by Orenstein]
Definite descriptions can't unambiguously pick out an object which doesn't exist [Lycan on Quine]
For Quine the only way to know a necessity is empirically [Quine, by Dancy,J]
Quine's empiricism is based on whole theoretical systems, not on single mental events [Quine, by Orenstein]
To proclaim cultural relativism is to thereby rise above it [Quine, by Newton-Smith]
For Quine, theories are instruments used to make predictions about observations [Quine, by O'Grady]
Quine says there is no matter of fact about reference - it is 'inscrutable' [Quine, by O'Grady]
The principle of charity only applies to the logical constants [Quine, by Miller,A]
Essence gives an illusion of understanding [Quine, by Almog]
Quine is committed to sets, but is more a Class Nominalist than a Platonist [Quine, by Macdonald,C]