more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 8026

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 3. Universalisability ]

Full Idea

With sufficient ingenuity, almost every precept can be consistently universalized.

Gist of Idea

Almost any precept can be consistently universalized

Source

comment on Immanuel Kant (Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals [1785]) by Alasdair MacIntyre - A Short History of Ethics Ch.14

Book Ref

MacIntyre,Alasdair: 'A Short History of Ethics' [Routledge 1967], p.197

A Reaction

A concise statement of J.S.Mill's point (Idea 3762). The point is that Kant seems to allow burglary, as long as you don't complain when you are burgled. What sort of maxim would a suicidal mass murderer being willing to universalize?

Related Idea

Idea 3762 Why couldn't all rational beings accept outrageously immoral rules of conduct? [Mill on Kant]

The 22 ideas with the same theme [seeing rules for action as universal guidelines]:

23396 Mozi condemns partiality, which is the cause of all the great harms in the world [Mozi]
23397 Those who are against impartiality still prefer impartial protectors [Mozi]
6031 The essence of propriety is consistency [Cicero]
4853 Rational people are self-interested, but also desire the same goods for other people [Spinoza]
4858 A rational person will want others to have the goods he seeks for himself [Spinoza]
8026 Almost any precept can be consistently universalized [MacIntyre on Kant]
6185 No one would lend money unless a universal law made it secure, even after death [Kant]
6187 Universality determines the will, and hence extends self-love into altruism [Kant]
8029 You can't have a morality which is supplied by the individual, but is also genuinely universal [Hegel, by MacIntyre]
20763 When my personal freedom becomes involved, I must want freedom for everyone else [Sartre]
2710 Moral judgements must invoke some sort of principle [Hare]
22409 We don't have a duty to ensure that others do their duty [Williams,B]
4122 If the self becomes completely impartial, it no longer has enough identity to worry about its interests [Williams,B]
4121 Why should I think of myself as both the legislator and the citizen who follows the laws? [Williams,B]
21051 Check your rationality by thinking of your opinion pronounced by the supreme court [Rawls]
6446 In ethics we abstract from our identity, but not from our humanity [Nagel]
3282 The general form of moral reasoning is putting yourself in other people's shoes [Nagel]
3294 As far as possible we should become instruments to realise what is best from an eternal point of view [Nagel]
3254 If we can decide how to live after stepping outside of ourselves, we have the basis of a moral theory [Nagel]
3264 We should see others' viewpoints, but not lose touch with our own values [Nagel]
4285 As soon as we drop self-interest and judge impartially, we find ourselves agreeing about conflicts [Scruton]
15674 One can universalise good advice, but that doesn't make it an obligation [Finlayson]