more on this theme
|
more from this text
Single Idea 8039
[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / b. Defining ethics
]
Full Idea
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable by relying on a bad dictionary definition of 'definition'.
Gist of Idea
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable, but doesn't understand what a definition is
Source
comment on G.E. Moore (Principia Ethica [1903]) by Alasdair MacIntyre - After Virtue: a Study in Moral Theory Ch.2
Book Ref
MacIntyre,Alasdair: 'After Virtue: a Study in Moral Theory' [Duckworth 1982], p.15
A Reaction
An interesting remark, with no further explanation offered. If Moore has this problem, then Plato had it too (see Idea 3032). I would have thought that any definition MacIntyre could offer would either be naturalistic, or tautological.
Related Idea
Idea 3032
I can form no notion of what the good is [Amphis]
The
23 ideas
from G.E. Moore
21342
|
A relation is internal if two things possessing the relation could not fail to be related
[Moore,GE, by Heil]
|
17992
|
The main aim of philosophy is to describe the whole Universe.
[Moore,GE]
|
7527
|
Analysis for Moore and Russell is carving up the world, not investigating language
[Moore,GE, by Monk]
|
6405
|
Moore's 'The Nature of Judgement' (1898) marked the rejection (with Russell) of idealism
[Moore,GE, by Grayling]
|
22302
|
Moor bypassed problems of correspondence by saying true propositions ARE facts
[Moore,GE, by Potter]
|
7526
|
Hegelians say propositions defy analysis, but Moore says they can be broken down
[Moore,GE, by Monk]
|
8039
|
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable, but doesn't understand what a definition is
[MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
|
22151
|
The Open Question argument leads to anti-realism and the fact-value distinction
[Boulter on Moore,GE]
|
8033
|
Moore cannot show why something being good gives us a reason for action
[MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
|
8032
|
Can learning to recognise a good friend help us to recognise a good watch?
[MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
|
11050
|
Moore's combination of antinaturalism with strong supervenience on the natural is incoherent
[Hanna on Moore,GE]
|
23726
|
Despite Moore's caution, non-naturalists incline towards intuitionism
[Moore,GE, by Smith,M]
|
5925
|
The three main values are good, right and beauty
[Moore,GE, by Ross]
|
5902
|
For Moore, 'right' is what produces good
[Moore,GE, by Ross]
|
5907
|
Relationships imply duties to people, not merely the obligation to benefit them
[Ross on Moore,GE]
|
11057
|
It is always an open question whether anything that is natural is good
[Moore,GE]
|
11056
|
The naturalistic fallacy claims that natural qualties can define 'good'
[Moore,GE]
|
5903
|
'Right' means 'cause of good result' (hence 'useful'), so the end does justify the means
[Moore,GE]
|
18676
|
We should ask what we would judge to be good if it existed in absolute isolation
[Moore,GE]
|
21233
|
The beautiful is whatever it is intrinsically good to admire
[Moore,GE]
|
6349
|
I can prove a hand exists, by holding one up, pointing to it, and saying 'here is one hand'
[Moore,GE]
|
20147
|
Arguments that my finger does not exist are less certain than your seeing my finger
[Moore,GE]
|
6672
|
Moore's Paradox: you can't assert 'I believe that p but p is false', but can assert 'You believe p but p is false'
[Moore,GE, by Lowe]
|