more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8081

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / A. Syllogistic Logic / 2. Syllogistic Logic ]

Full Idea

Most people find it hard to find any conclusion that fits the following premises: 'No councillors are bankers', and 'All bankers are athletes'. There is a valid conclusion ('Some athletes are not councillors') but it takes quite an effort to find it.

Gist of Idea

'No councillors are bankers' and 'All bankers are athletes' implies 'Some athletes are not councillors'

Source

Keith Devlin (Goodbye Descartes [1997], Ch. 2)

Book Ref

Devlin,Keith: 'Goodbye Descartes: the end of logic' [Wiley 1997], p.43


A Reaction

A nice illustration of the fact that syllogistic logic is by no means automatic and straightforward. There is a mechanical procedure, but a lot of intuition and common sense is also needed.


The 13 ideas from Keith Devlin

Sentences of apparent identical form can have different contextual meanings [Devlin]
How do we parse 'time flies like an arrow' and 'fruit flies like an apple'? [Devlin]
The distinction between sentences and abstract propositions is crucial in logic [Devlin]
Space and time are atomic in the arrow, and divisible in the tortoise [Devlin]
'No councillors are bankers' and 'All bankers are athletes' implies 'Some athletes are not councillors' [Devlin]
Where a conditional is purely formal, an implication implies a link between premise and conclusion [Devlin]
Golden ages: 1900-1960 for pure logic, and 1950-1985 for applied logic [Devlin]
Modern propositional inference replaces Aristotle's 19 syllogisms with modus ponens [Devlin]
Predicate logic retains the axioms of propositional logic [Devlin]
People still say the Hopi have no time concepts, despite Whorf's later denial [Devlin]
Situation theory is logic that takes account of context [Devlin]
Montague's intensional logic incorporated the notion of meaning [Devlin]
Logic was merely a branch of rhetoric until the scientific 17th century [Devlin]