more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8181

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 5. Meaning as Verification ]

Full Idea

If we adopt a justificationist theory of meaning, we must reject the universal law of excluded middle, and with it classical logic (which rests on the two-valued semantics of bivalence). We admit only intuitionist logic, which preserves justifiability.

Clarification

'Justificationist' is Dummett's renaming of the older 'verificationist' theory

Gist of Idea

A justificationist theory of meaning leads to the rejection of classical logic

Source

Michael Dummett (Thought and Reality [1997], 5)

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Thought and Reality (Gifford Lectures)' [OUP 2006], p.64


A Reaction

This is Dummett's philosophy in a very neat nutshell. He seems to have started by accepting Brouwer's intuitionism, and then working back to language. It all implies anti-realism. I don't buy it.


The 21 ideas from 'Thought and Reality'

Since 'no bird here' and 'no squirrel here' seem the same, we must talk of 'atomic' facts [Dummett]
We know we can state facts, with true statements [Dummett]
To 'abstract from' is a logical process, as opposed to the old mental view [Dummett]
Truth is part of semantics, since valid inference preserves truth [Dummett]
If Presentism is correct, we cannot even say that the present changes [Dummett]
To know the truth-conditions of a sentence, you must already know the meaning [Dummett]
Sentences are the primary semantic units, because they can say something [Dummett]
We can't distinguish a proposition from its content [Dummett]
A theory of thought will include propositional attitudes as well as propositions [Dummett]
The theories of meaning and understanding are the only routes to an account of thought [Dummett]
Language can violate bivalence because of non-referring terms or ill-defined predicates [Dummett]
We could only guess the meanings of 'true' and 'false' when sentences were used [Dummett]
The law of excluded middle is the logical reflection of the principle of bivalence [Dummett]
'That is red or orange' might be considered true, even though 'that is red' and 'that is orange' were not [Dummett]
Empirical and a priori knowledge are not distinct, but are extremes of a sliding scale [Dummett]
A justificationist theory of meaning leads to the rejection of classical logic [Dummett]
Verificationism could be realist, if we imagined the verification by a superhuman power [Dummett]
If truths about the past depend on memories and current evidence, the past will change [Dummett]
Philosophers should not presume reality, but only invoke it when language requires it [Dummett]
We can't make sense of a world not apprehended by a mind [Dummett]
Time is the measure of change, so we can't speak of time before all change [Dummett]