more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8331

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 1. Justification / b. Need for justification ]

Full Idea

The point of our investigation is to acquire knowledge, and a prerequisite for knowing [eidenai] anything is understanding why it is as it is - in other words, grasping its primary cause.

Gist of Idea

To know something we need understanding, which is grasp of the primary cause

Source

Aristotle (Physics [c.337 BCE], 194b18)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Physics', ed/tr. Waterfield,Robin [OUP 1996], p.38


A Reaction

He then proceeds to identify four types of cause (Idea 8332). I can't think of a better account of knowledge. If we want to know that cigarettes cause cancer, we must get beyond the statistical correlation, and grasp the physical mechanisms.

Related Ideas

Idea 8332 The four causes are the material, the form, the source, and the end [Aristotle]

Idea 543 All men long to understand, as shown by their delight in the senses [Aristotle]

Idea 12038 Translate as 'humans all desire by nature to understand' (not as 'to know') [Aristotle, by Annas]


The 12 ideas with the same theme [why knowledge needs justification]:

As a guide to action, true opinion is as good as knowledge [Plato]
True belief without knowledge is like blind people on the right road [Plato]
True opinion without reason is midway between wisdom and ignorance [Plato]
An inadequate rational account would still not justify knowledge [Plato]
To know something we need understanding, which is grasp of the primary cause [Aristotle]
Fools, infants and madmen may speak truly, but do not know [Sext.Empiricus]
Believing without a reason may just be love of your own fantasies [Locke]
Justification is neither sufficient nor necessary for knowledge [Lewis]
What we want to know is - when is it all right to believe something? [Pollock]
If value is practical, knowledge is no better than true opinion [Greco]
Many philosophers rate justification as a more important concept than knowledge [Bird]
If knowledge is unanalysable, that makes justification more important [Dougherty/Rysiew]