more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8376

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 7. Eliminating causation ]

Full Idea

A cause is an event lasting for a finite time, but if cause and effect are contiguous then the earlier part of a changing cause can be altered without altering the effect, and a static cause will exist placidly for some time and then explode into effect.

Gist of Idea

If causes are contiguous with events, only the last bit is relevant, or the event's timing is baffling

Source

Bertrand Russell (On the Notion of Cause [1912], p.177)

Book Ref

Russell,Bertrand: 'Mysticism and Logic' [Unwin 1989], p.177


A Reaction

[very compressed] He concludes that they can't be contiguous (and eventually rejects cause entirely). This kind of problem is the sort of thing that only bothers philosophers - the question of how anything can happen at all. Why change?


The 19 ideas with the same theme [scepticism about the whole idea of causation]:

There are no causes, because they are relative, and alike things can't cause one another [Pyrrho, by Diog. Laertius]
If there were no causes then everything would have been randomly produced by everything [Sext.Empiricus]
Knowing an effect results from a cause means knowing that the cause belongs with the effect, which is circular [Sext.Empiricus]
Cause can't exist before effect, or exist at the same time, so it doesn't exist [Sext.Empiricus]
Hume never even suggests that there is no such thing as causation [Hume, by Strawson,G]
The search for first or final causes is futile [Comte]
Cause and effect is a hypothesis, based on our supposed willing of actions [Nietzsche]
Science has taken the meaning out of causation; cause and effect are two equal sides of an equation [Nietzsche]
The law of causality is a source of confusion, and should be dropped from philosophy [Russell]
If causes are contiguous with events, only the last bit is relevant, or the event's timing is baffling [Russell]
Moments and points seem to imply other moments and points, but don't cause them [Russell]
We can drop 'cause', and just make inferences between facts [Russell]
We should analyse causation in terms of powers [Molnar]
A mind that could see cause and effect as a continuum would deny cause and effect [Richardson]
Maybe scientific causation is just generalisation about the patterns [Hawthorne]
The Uncertainty Principle implies that cause and effect can't be measured [Watson]
The notion of causation allows understanding of science, without appearing in equations [Schaffer,J]
Causation is utterly essential for numerous philosophical explanations [Schaffer,J]
Causation is found in the special sciences, but may have no role in fundamental physics [Ladyman/Ross]