more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Philosophers are too apt to take their views on science from each other, not from science.
Gist of Idea
Philosophers usually learn science from each other, not from science
Source
Bertrand Russell (On the Notion of Cause [1912], p.178)
Book Ref
Russell,Bertrand: 'Mysticism and Logic' [Unwin 1989], p.178
A Reaction
This wasn't true of Russell, but it is certainly true of me. I rely on philosophical researchers to find the interesting bits of science for me (like blindsight). Memo to myself: read more science.
| 4396 | The law of causality is a source of confusion, and should be dropped from philosophy [Russell] |
| 8375 | 'Necessary' is a predicate of a propositional function, saying it is true for all values of its argument [Russell] |
| 8376 | If causes are contiguous with events, only the last bit is relevant, or the event's timing is baffling [Russell] |
| 8378 | Philosophers usually learn science from each other, not from science [Russell] |
| 8379 | In causal laws, 'events' must recur, so they have to be universals, not particulars [Russell] |
| 8380 | Striking a match causes its igniting, even if it sometimes doesn't work [Russell] |
| 8381 | The constancy of scientific laws rests on differential equations, not on cause and effect [Russell] |