more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8397

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / c. Counterfactual causation ]

Full Idea

Some counterfactuals are based on non-causal laws, such as Newton's Third Law of Motion. 'If no force one way, then no force the other'. Lewis's counterfactual analysis implies that one force causes the other, which is not the case.

Gist of Idea

Counterfactual causation implies all laws are causal, which they aren't

Source

comment on David Lewis (Causation [1973]) by Michael Tooley - Causation and Supervenience 5.2

Book Ref

'The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics', ed/tr. Loux,M /Zimmerman,D [OUP 2005], p.409


A Reaction

So what exactly does 'cause' my punt to move forwards? Basing causal laws on counterfactual claims looks to me like putting the cart before the horse.


The 15 ideas from 'Causation'

If dispositions are more fundamental than causes, then they won't conceptually reduce to them [Bird on Lewis]
A theory of causation should explain why cause precedes effect, not take it for granted [Lewis, by Field,H]
It is just individious discrimination to pick out one cause and label it as 'the' cause [Lewis]
The counterfactual view says causes are necessary (rather than sufficient) for their effects [Lewis, by Bird]
Lewis has basic causation, counterfactuals, and a general ancestral (thus handling pre-emption) [Lewis, by Bird]
Counterfactual causation implies all laws are causal, which they aren't [Tooley on Lewis]
Lewis's account of counterfactuals is fine if we know what a law of nature is, but it won't explain the latter [Cohen,LJ on Lewis]
The modern regularity view says a cause is a member of a minimal set of sufficient conditions [Lewis]
A proposition is a set of possible worlds where it is true [Lewis]
Regularity analyses could make c an effect of e, or an epiphenomenon, or inefficacious, or pre-empted [Lewis]
My counterfactual analysis applies to particular cases, not generalisations [Lewis]
Determinism says there can't be two identical worlds up to a time, with identical laws, which then differ [Lewis]
For true counterfactuals, both antecedent and consequent true is closest to actuality [Lewis]
One event causes another iff there is a causal chain from first to second [Lewis]
I reject making the direction of causation axiomatic, since that takes too much for granted [Lewis]